From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Liu Peibao <liupeibao@loongson.cn>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Jiaxun Yang" <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>,
"Jianmin Lv" <lvjianmin@loongson.cn>,
"Yinbo Zhu" <zhuyinbo@loongson.cn>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: loongson: skip scanning unavailable child device
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 15:15:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107211525.GA419924@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221104105340.20610-1-liupeibao@loongson.cn>
Capitalize subject line to match other commits:
930c6074d7dd ("PCI: loongson: Work around LS7A incorrect Interrupt Pin registers")
2410e3301fcc ("PCI: loongson: Don't access non-existent devices")
cd89edda4002 ("PCI: loongson: Add ACPI init support")
dee449aafd48 ("PCI: loongson: Use generic 8/16/32-bit config ops on LS2K/LS7A")
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 06:53:40PM +0800, Liu Peibao wrote:
> The PCI Controller of 2k1000 could not mask devices by
> setting vender id or device id in configuration space header
> as invalid values. When there are pins shareble between
> the platform device and PCI device, if the platform device
> is preferred, we should not scan this PCI device. In the
> above scene, add `status = "disabled"` property in DT node
> of this PCI device.
Rewrap this to fill 75 columns.
s/id/ID/
s/shareble/shareable/
> Signed-off-by: Liu Peibao <liupeibao@loongson.cn>
> ---
> V2 -> V3: 1. use list_for_each_entry() for more clearly.
> 2. fix wrong use of sizeof().
> V1 -> V2: use existing property "status" instead of adding new property.
>
>
> drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
> index 05c50408f13b..c7dd88eac885 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-loongson.c
> @@ -40,11 +40,21 @@ struct loongson_pci_data {
> struct pci_ops *ops;
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +struct mask_entry {
> + struct list_head entry;
> + unsigned int devfn;
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> struct loongson_pci {
> void __iomem *cfg0_base;
> void __iomem *cfg1_base;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> const struct loongson_pci_data *data;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + struct list_head masklist;
> +#endif
> };
>
> /* Fixup wrong class code in PCIe bridges */
> @@ -194,6 +204,18 @@ static void __iomem *pci_loongson_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + /* Don't access devices in masklist */
> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
> + struct mask_entry *entry;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, &priv->masklist, entry) {
> + if (devfn == entry->devfn)
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
I would probably get rid of the masklist and just search for a disabled
property when reading config offset 0 (vendor ID). That's not a
performance path anyway. And this seems similar to the
FLAG_DEV_HIDDEN path where you probably don't need to do it for all
controllers.
> /* CFG0 can only access standard space */
> if (where < PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE && priv->cfg0_base)
> return cfg0_map(priv, bus, devfn, where);
> @@ -206,6 +228,36 @@ static void __iomem *pci_loongson_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int setup_masklist(struct loongson_pci *priv)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *dn, *parent = dev->of_node;
> + struct mask_entry *entry;
> + int devfn;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->masklist);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(parent, dn) {
> + /*
> + * if device is not available, add this to masklist
> + * to avoid scanning it.
> + */
> + if (!of_device_is_available(dn)) {
> + devfn = of_pci_get_devfn(dn);
> + if (devfn < 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + entry = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + entry->devfn = devfn;
> + list_add_tail(&entry->entry, &priv->masklist);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
>
> static int loongson_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
> {
> @@ -305,6 +357,9 @@ static int loongson_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> + if (setup_masklist(priv))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> bridge->sysdata = priv;
> bridge->ops = priv->data->ops;
> bridge->map_irq = loongson_map_irq;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-07 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 10:53 [PATCH v3] PCI: loongson: skip scanning unavailable child device Liu Peibao
2022-11-07 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-11-08 3:57 ` Liu Peibao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221107211525.GA419924@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@loongson.cn \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liupeibao@loongson.cn \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=lvjianmin@loongson.cn \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=zhuyinbo@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox