From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@oracle.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sysfs interface to force power off
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:53:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221108095302.GA29279@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107204129.GA417338@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:41:29PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 07:08:34PM -0400, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
> > Looking to solve a problem where we have nvme drives that are hung
> > in the field and we are not sure of the root cause but the working
> > theory is that the controller is "bad" and not responding properly
> > to commands. The nvme driver times out on outstanding IO requests
> > and as part of recovery, attempts to reset the controller and
> > reinitialize the device. The reset controller also hangs like here
> > --
> >
> > ernel:info: [10419813.132341] Workqueue: nvme-reset-wq nvme_reset_work [nvme]
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132342] Call Trace:
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132345] __schedule+0x2bc/0x89b
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132348] schedule+0x36/0x7c
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132351] blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0x4b/0xaa
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132353] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132359] nvme_wait_freeze+0x33/0x50 [nvme_core]
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132362] nvme_reset_work+0x802/0xd84 [nvme]
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132364] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x62
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132365] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x62
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132367] ? __switch_to+0x9b/0x505
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132368] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x62
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132370] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x62
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132372] process_one_work+0x169/0x399
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132374] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e5
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132377] kthread+0x105/0x138
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132379] ? rescuer_thread+0x380/0x375
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132380] ? kthread_bind+0x20/0x15
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.132382] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x49
> > ...
> >
> > So, I tried to hot power off the device via
> > "echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/X/power" -- the thread also hangs
> > waiting for the nvme reset thread to finish (like so) --
>
> Looks like this "power" sysfs file could use some documentation. I
> couldn't find anything in Documentation/ABI/testing/ that seems to
> cover it.
That sysfs attribute was introduced in early 2002, I guess we were
less diligent with documentation back then:
http://git.kernel.org/tglx/history/c/a8a2069f432c
(search for power_write_file() in the commit)
The problem here is in the NVMe / block layer, not the PCI layer.
nvme_wait_freeze() calls blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(), but obviously
it should call blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout() instead and handle
a timeout by retiring any outstanding I/O requests to the drive and
marking it as dead.
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158116] __schedule+0x2bc/0x89b
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158119] schedule+0x36/0x7c
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158122] schedule_timeout+0x1f6/0x31f
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158124] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x11/0xa5
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158126] ? try_to_wake_up+0x59/0x505
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158130] wait_for_completion+0x12b/0x18a
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158132] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x73
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158134] flush_work+0x122/0x1a7
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158137] ? wake_up_worker+0x30/0x2b
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158141] nvme_remove+0x71/0x100 [nvme]
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158146] pci_device_remove+0x3e/0xb6
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158149] device_release_driver_internal+0x134/0x1eb
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158151] device_release_driver+0x12/0x14
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158155] pci_stop_bus_device+0x7c/0x96
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158158] pci_stop_bus_device+0x39/0x96
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158164] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0x12/0x1d
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158167] pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x7a/0x1d7
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158169] pciehp_disable_slot+0x52/0xca
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158171] pciehp_sysfs_disable_slot+0x67/0x112
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158174] disable_slot+0x12/0x14
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158175] power_write_file+0x6e/0xf8
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158179] pci_slot_attr_store+0x24/0x2e
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158180] sysfs_kf_write+0x3f/0x46
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158182] kernfs_fop_write+0x124/0x1a3
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158184] __vfs_write+0x3a/0x16d
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158187] ? audit_filter_syscall+0x33/0xce
> > kernel:warning: [10419813.158189] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1a1
> >
> > Is there a way to force power off the device instead of the
> > "graceful" approach? Obviously, we don't want to reset the system
> > and don't have physical access to the device.
> >
> > Would it make sense to create a "force power off" in
> > /sys/bus/pci/slots/X which basically
The power attribute in sysfs already does what you want, but when
unbinding the nvme driver from the device, the flush_work() call
waits for nvme_reset_work() to finish. And because that's stuck,
unbinding also gets stuck. Again, the solution is a code fix
in the NVMe / block layer, so the proper mailing list to ask
would be linux-nvme and linux-block.
Thanks,
Lukas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-08 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 23:08 sysfs interface to force power off James Puthukattukaran
2022-11-07 20:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-07 21:14 ` [External] : " James Puthukattukaran
2022-11-07 21:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-08 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-08 20:16 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-11-08 20:37 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-08 9:53 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221108095302.GA29279@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=james.puthukattukaran@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).