linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wei Gong <gongwei833x@gmail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: fix device presence detection for VFs
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 09:02:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221108150228.GA473246@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221108145300.GA472813@bhelgaas>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 08:53:00AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:11:21AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > virtio uses the same driver for VFs and PFs.  Accordingly,
> > pci_device_is_present is used to detect device presence. This function
> > isn't currently working properly for VFs since it attempts reading
> > device and vendor ID.
> 
> > As VFs are present if and only if PF is present,
> > just return the value for that device.
> 
> VFs are only present when the PF is present *and* the PF has VF Enable
> set.  Do you care about the possibility that VF Enable has been
> cleared?

Can you also include a hint about how the problem manifests, and a URL
to the report if available?

It's beyond the scope of this patch, but I've never liked the
semantics of pci_device_is_present() because it's racy by design.  All
it tells us is that some time in the *past*, the device was present.
It's telling that almost all calls test for !pci_device_is_present(),
which does make a little more sense.

> > Reported-by: Wei Gong <gongwei833x@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Wei Gong, thanks for your testing of the RFC!
> > As I made a small change, would appreciate re-testing.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > changes from RFC:
> > 	use pci_physfn() wrapper to make the code build without PCI_IOV
> > 
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 2127aba3550b..899b3f52e84e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -6445,8 +6445,13 @@ bool pci_devs_are_dma_aliases(struct pci_dev *dev1, struct pci_dev *dev2)
> >  
> >  bool pci_device_is_present(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> > +	struct pci_dev *physfn = pci_physfn(pdev);
> >  	u32 v;
> >  
> > +	/* Not a PF? Switch to the PF. */
> > +	if (physfn != pdev)
> > +		return pci_device_is_present(physfn);
> > +
> >  	if (pci_dev_is_disconnected(pdev))
> >  		return false;
> >  	return pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(pdev->bus, pdev->devfn, &v, 0);
> > -- 
> > MST
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26  6:11 [PATCH v2] pci: fix device presence detection for VFs Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-10-26 13:46 ` Wei Gong
2022-11-08  4:52 ` Wei Gong
2022-11-08  4:58   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-08  5:06     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10 19:35   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-10 20:15     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-11 23:42       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-13  8:46         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-15 16:24           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-16 11:16           ` Lukas Wunner
2022-11-17  5:36             ` Parav Pandit
2022-12-19  5:56               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-12-19  8:22                 ` Lukas Wunner
2022-11-11  4:00     ` Wei Gong
2022-11-08 14:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-08 15:02   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2022-11-08 15:19     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-08 17:58       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-08 18:02         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-09  4:36           ` Wei Gong
2022-11-09  5:12             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-09  7:00               ` Wei Gong
2022-11-09  7:10               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-09 17:30                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-09 17:49                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-11 23:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221108150228.GA473246@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gongwei833x@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).