From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Huang <adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: vmd: Fix boot failure when trying to clean up domain before enumeration
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:46:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230109214613.GA1445262@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109125148.16813-1-adrianhuang0701@gmail.com>
Can we make the subject line any more specific about what this patch
does? Apparently this is really about avoiding accidental enablement
of the window because the base & limit can't be updated atomically?
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:51:48PM +0800, Adrian Huang wrote:
> From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
>
> Commit 6aab5622296b ("PCI: vmd: Clean up domain before enumeration")
> clears PCI configuration space of VMD root ports. However, the host OS
> cannot boot successfully with the following error message:
>
> vmd 0000:64:05.5: PCI host bridge to bus 10000:00
> ...
> vmd 0000:64:05.5: Bound to PCI domain 10000
> ...
> DMAR: VT-d detected Invalidation Queue Error: Reason f
> DMAR: VT-d detected Invalidation Time-out Error: SID ffff
> DMAR: VT-d detected Invalidation Completion Error: SID ffff
> DMAR: QI HEAD: UNKNOWN qw0 = 0x0, qw1 = 0x0
> DMAR: QI PRIOR: UNKNOWN qw0 = 0x0, qw1 = 0x0
> DMAR: Invalidation Time-out Error (ITE) cleared
>
> The root cause is that memset_io() clears prefetchable memory base/limit
> registers and prefetchable base/limit 32 bits registers sequentially. This
> might enable prefetchable memory if the device disables prefetchable memory
> originally. Here is an example (before memset_io()):
>
> PCI configuration space for 10000:00:00.0:
> 86 80 30 20 06 00 10 00 04 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 00 00 00 20
> 00 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 ff ff ff ff 75 05 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 02 00
>
> So, prefetchable memory is ffffffff00000000-575000fffff, which is disabled.
> Here is the quote from section 7.5.1.3.9 of PCI Express Base 6.0 spec:
>
> The Prefetchable Memory Limit register must be programmed to a smaller
> value than the Prefetchable Memory Base register if there is no
> prefetchable memory on the secondary side of the bridge.
>
> When memset_io() clears prefetchable base 32 bits register, the
> prefetchable memory becomes 0000000000000000-575000fffff, which is enabled.
#define PCI_IO_BASE 0x1c
#define PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 0x2c
#define PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 0x38
memset_io(base + PCI_IO_BASE, 0, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 - PCI_IO_BASE);
The memset does clear PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 already, but I think
you're saying that PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT, and
PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 are cleared first, so there is a time when the
prefetchable base is zero and the limit is non-zero, so the window is
enabled.
I would expect that to be a transient thing that you wouldn't be
likely to trip over, but you seem to see it consistently.
> This behavior causes that the content of PCI configuration space of VMD
> root ports is 0xff after invoking memset_io() in vmd_domain_reset():
Well, it doesn't actually change the content of config space, does it?
I assume these config accesses get routed the wrong place because the
window is enabled, and some PCI error like Unsupported Request is
getting turned into ~0?
I don't understand why this seems to be a stable state, though.
Seems sort of unexpected to me that config space would be in a
*prefetchable* window, but I guess that must be a VMD thing.
> 10000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Sky Lake-E PCI Express Root Port A (rev ff) (prog-if ff)
> !!! Unknown header type 7f
> 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ...
> f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>
> 10000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Sky Lake-E PCI Express Root Port B (rev ff) (prog-if ff)
> !!! Unknown header type 7f
> 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ...
> f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
>
> To fix the issue, prefetchable limit upper 32 bits register needs to be
> cleared firstly. This also adheres to the implementation of
> pci_setup_bridge_mmio_pref(). Please see the function for detail.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216644
> Fixes: 6aab5622296b ("PCI: vmd: Clean up domain before enumeration")
> Cc: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 769eedeb8802..e520aec55b68 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -526,6 +526,9 @@ static void vmd_domain_reset(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
> PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI))
> continue;
>
> + /* Clear the upper 32 bits of PREF limit. */
> + memset_io(base + PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32, 0, 4);
> +
> memset_io(base + PCI_IO_BASE, 0,
> PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 - PCI_IO_BASE);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 12:51 [PATCH 1/1] PCI: vmd: Fix boot failure when trying to clean up domain before enumeration Adrian Huang
2023-01-09 20:57 ` Jonathan Derrick
2023-01-09 21:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-01-11 6:37 ` Huang Adrian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230109214613.GA1445262@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=adrianhuang0701@gmail.com \
--cc=ahuang12@lenovo.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox