linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Li, Ming" <ming4.li@intel.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT header
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 10:34:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230211093455.GA28981@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <63e6e3ef4d84e_1e4943294e6@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:40:15PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > cxl_cdat_get_length() only checks whether the DOE response size is
> > sufficient for the Table Access response header (1 dword), but not the
> > succeeding CDAT header (1 dword length plus other fields).
> > 
> > It thus returns whatever uninitialized memory happens to be on the stack
> > if a truncated DOE response with only 1 dword was received.  Fix it.
[...]
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> > @@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static int cxl_cdat_get_length(struct device *dev,
> >  		return rc;
> >  	}
> >  	wait_for_completion(&t.c);
> > -	if (t.task.rv < sizeof(u32))
> > +	if (t.task.rv < 2 * sizeof(u32))
> >  		return -EIO;
> 
> Looks good, I wonder since this is standard for all data objects whether
> the check should be pushed into the core?

No, "t.task.rv" contains the payload length in bytes of the response
received via DOE.  It doesn't include the DOE header.

I think it is legal to receive an empty response via DOE, so I cannot
push a length check down into the core.

In this case, the payload contains one dword for the Table Access Response
header (CXL r3.0 sec 8.1.11.1), followed by 3 dwords for the CDAT header:

https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Coherent%20Device%20Attribute%20Table_1.01.pdf

The CDAT header contains the length of the entire CDAT in the first
dword, hence the above-quoted check only verifies that at least two
dwords were received.  It's harmless if the remainder of the CDAT
header is truncated.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-11  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 20:25 [PATCH v3 00/16] Collection of DOE material Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] cxl/pci: Fix CDAT retrieval on big endian Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:22   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-19 13:03     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:15   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-14 13:51     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 15:45       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-28  2:53   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  8:24     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28 12:08       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT header Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:40   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11  9:34     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-02-14 11:16   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  1:41   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT entries Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  0:50   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-11 10:56     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:30   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/pci: Handle excessive CDAT length Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  1:04   ` Dan Williams
2023-02-14 11:33   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 10:26     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-17 10:01       ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak " Lukas Wunner
2023-02-11  1:06   ` Dan Williams
2023-03-01  1:51   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] PCI/DOE: Provide synchronous API and use it internally Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  1:45   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28 18:58   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/pci: Use synchronous API for DOE Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] PCI/DOE: Make asynchronous API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  1:48   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] PCI/DOE: Deduplicate mailbox flushing Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:36   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  5:07   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] PCI/DOE: Allow mailbox creation without devres management Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 11:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-15  5:17   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI/DOE: Create mailboxes on device enumeration Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  2:07   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-28  1:18   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  1:39     ` Dan Williams
2023-02-28  5:43     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28  7:24       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28 10:42         ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-02 20:22         ` Lukas Wunner
2023-03-07  1:55           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-04-03  0:55           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/pci: Use CDAT DOE mailbox created by PCI core Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] PCI/DOE: Make mailbox creation API private Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  2:13   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] PCI/DOE: Relax restrictions on request and response size Lukas Wunner
2023-02-15  5:05   ` Li, Ming
2023-02-15 11:49     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-10 20:25 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] cxl/pci: Rightsize CDAT response allocation Lukas Wunner
2023-02-14 13:05   ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16  0:56   ` Ira Weiny
2023-02-16  8:03     ` Lukas Wunner
2023-02-28  1:45   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-28  5:55     ` Lukas Wunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230211093455.GA28981@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=ming4.li@intel.com \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).