Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Fix dropping valid root bus resources with .end = zero
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:41:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213224150.GA2940509@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da0fcd5e86c74239be79c7cb03651c0fce31b515.1676036673.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 02:46:39PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On r8a7791/koelsch:
> 
>     kmemleak: 1 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
>     # cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>     unreferenced object 0xc3a34e00 (size 64):
>       comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294937460 (age 199.080s)
>       hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 	b4 5d 81 f0 b4 5d 81 f0 c0 b0 a2 c3 00 00 00 00  .]...]..........
> 	00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>       backtrace:
> 	[<fe3aa979>] __kmalloc+0xf0/0x140
> 	[<34bd6bc0>] resource_list_create_entry+0x18/0x38
> 	[<767046bc>] pci_add_resource_offset+0x20/0x68
> 	[<b3f3edf2>] devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources.constprop.0+0xb0/0x390
> 
> When coalescing two resources for a contiguous aperture, the second
> resource is enlarged to cover the full contiguous range, while the
> first resource is marked invalid.  This invalidation is done by
> clearing the flags, start, and end members.
> 
> When adding the initial resources to the bus later, invalid resources
> are skipped.  Unfortunately, the check for an invalid resource considers
> only the end member, causing false positives.
> 
> E.g. on r8a7791/koelsch, root bus resource 0 ("bus 00") is skipped, and
> no longer registered with pci_bus_insert_busn_res() (causing the memory
> leak), nor printed:
> 
>      pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: host bridge /soc/pci@ee090000 ranges:
>      pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci:      MEM 0x00ee080000..0x00ee08ffff -> 0x00ee080000
>      pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI: revision 11
>      pci-rcar-gen2 ee090000.pci: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>     -pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00]
>      pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xee080000-0xee08ffff]
> 
> Fix this by only skipping resources where all of the flags, start, and
> end members are zero.
> 
> Fixes: 7c3855c423b17f6c ("PCI: Coalesce host bridge contiguous apertures")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Tested-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>

Applied to pci/resource for v6.3, thanks!

> ---
> Is there any side effect of not registering the root bus resource with
> pci_bus_insert_busn_res()?  This is the resource created by
> of_pci_parse_bus_range(), and thus affects any DT platforms using
> "bus-range = <0 0>".
> 
> Perhaps checking for "!res->flags" would be sufficient?
> 
> I wonder if this still causes memory leaks on systems where resources
> are coalesced, as the first resource of a contiguous aperture is no
> longer referenced? Perhaps instead of clearing the resource, it should
> be removed from the list (and freed? is it actually safe to do that?)?
>   - Bjorn thinks these would normally be freed via
>     __acpi_pci_root_release_info() (if the host bridge were
>     hot-removed), so probably not a leak since the invalidated resource
>     is still in the info->resources list and should be freed even though
>     it's been invalidated.
>   - Furthermore, Bjorn suspects it could probably be removed from the
>     list and freed here, and maybe even in the first loop when we
>     coalesce it, so we wouldn't have to check in the second loop.
> 
> However, let's fix one bug at a time? This has been dragging on for
> about half a year....
> 
> Apparently Johannes had identified the bug before, but didn't realize
> the full impact...
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/5331e942ff28bb191d62bb403b03ceb7d750856c.camel@sipsolutions.net/
> 
> v3:
>   - Actually the second resource is enlarged, and the first one is
>     invalidated,
> 
> v2:
>   - Add Tested-by, Acked-by.
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 1779582fb5007cd1..5988584825482e9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ static int pci_register_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>  	resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, &resources) {
>  		offset = window->offset;
>  		res = window->res;
> -		if (!res->end)
> +		if (!res->flags && !res->start && !res->end)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		list_move_tail(&window->node, &bridge->windows);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 13:46 [PATCH v3] PCI: Fix dropping valid root bus resources with .end = zero Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-02-13 22:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213224150.GA2940509@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox