[PATCH 03/12] pci: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion detection

[Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>]

pci_epf_test_data_transfer() and pci_epf_test_dma_callback() are not
handling DMA transfer completion correctly, leading to completion
notifications to the RC side that are too early. This problem can be
detected when the RC side is running an IOMMU with messages such as:

pci-endpoint-test 0000:0b:00.0: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT
domain=0x001c address=0xfff00000 flags=0x0000]

When running the pcitest.sh tests: the address used for a previous
test transfer generates the above error while the next test transfer is
running.

Fix this by testing the dma transfer status in
pci_epf_test_dma_callback() and notifying the completion only when the
transfer status is DMA_COMPLETE or DMA_ERROR. Furthermore, in
pci_epf_test_data_transfer(), be paranoid and check again the transfer
status and always call dmaengine_terminate_sync() before returning.

While at it, also modify the channel tx submit call to use
dmaengine_submit() instead of the hard coded call to the tx_submit()
operation.

Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 42 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index 55283d2379a6..030769893efb 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct pci_epf_test {
 	struct delayed_work	cmd_handler;
 	struct dma_chan		*dma_chan_tx;
 	struct dma_chan		*dma_chan_rx;
+	struct dma_chan		*transfer_chan;
+	dma_cookie_t		transfer_cookie;
+	enum dma_status		transfer_status;
 	struct completion	transfer_complete;
 	bool			dma_supported;
 	bool			dma_private;
@@ -85,8 +88,14 @@ static size_t bar_size[] = { 512, 512, 1024, 16384, 131072, 1048576 };
 static void pci_epf_test_dma_callback(void *param)
 {
 	struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = param;
-
-	complete(&epf_test->transfer_complete);
+	struct dma_tx_state state;
+
+	epf_test->transfer_status =
+		dmaengine_tx_status(epf_test->transfer_chan,
+				    epf_test->transfer_cookie, &state);
+	if (epf_test->transfer_status == DMA_COMPLETE ||
+	    epf_test->transfer_status == DMA_ERROR)
+		complete(&epf_test->transfer_complete);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -120,7 +129,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_data_transfer(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
 	struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx;
 	struct dma_slave_config sconf = {};
 	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
-	dma_cookie_t cookie;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(chan)) {
@@ -151,26 +159,36 @@ static int pci_epf_test_data_transfer(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
+	reinit_completion(&epf_test->transfer_complete);
+	epf_test->transfer_chan = chan;
 	tx->callback = pci_epf_test_dma_callback;
 	tx->callback_param = epf_test;
-	cookie = tx->tx_submit(tx);
-	reinit_completion(&epf_test->transfer_complete);
+	epf_test->transfer_cookie = dmaengine_submit(tx);
 
-	ret = dma_submit_error(cookie);
+	ret = dma_submit_error(epf_test->transfer_cookie);
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_err(dev, "Failed to do DMA tx_submit %d\n", cookie);
-		return -EIO;
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to do DMA tx_submit %d\n", ret);
+		goto terminate;
 	}
 
 	dma_async_issue_pending(chan);
 	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&epf_test->transfer_complete);
 	if (ret < 0) {
-		dmaengine_terminate_sync(chan);
-		dev_err(dev, "DMA wait_for_completion_timeout\n");
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		dev_err(dev, "DMA wait_for_completion interrupted\n");
+		goto terminate;
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+	if (epf_test->transfer_status == DMA_ERROR) {
+		dev_err(dev, "DMA transfer failed\n");
+		ret = -EIO;
+	}
+
+	WARN_ON(epf_test->transfer_status != DMA_COMPLETE);
+
+terminate:
+	dmaengine_terminate_sync(chan);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 struct epf_dma_filter {
-- 
2.39.1