linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: epf-test: Simply pci_epf_test_raise_irq()
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:57:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230315152744.GI98488@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230308090313.1653-8-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 06:03:04PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Change the interface of the function pci_epf_test_raise_irq() to
> directly pass a pointer to the struct pci_epf_test_reg defining the test
> being executed. This avoids the need for grabbing this pointer with a
> cast of the register bar and simplifies the call sites as the irq type
> and irq numbers do not have to be passed as arguments.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>

Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Mani

> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 21 +++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 1fc245d79a8e..6f4ef5251452 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -609,29 +609,27 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test, u8 irq_type,
> -				   u16 irq)
> +static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> +				   struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
>  {
>  	struct pci_epf *epf = epf_test->epf;
>  	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
>  	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> -	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
> -	struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg = epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar];
>  
>  	reg->status |= STATUS_IRQ_RAISED;
>  
> -	switch (irq_type) {
> +	switch (reg->irq_type) {
>  	case IRQ_TYPE_LEGACY:
>  		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
>  				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY, 0);
>  		break;
>  	case IRQ_TYPE_MSI:
>  		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
> -				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI, irq);
> +				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI, reg->irq_number);
>  		break;
>  	case IRQ_TYPE_MSIX:
>  		pci_epc_raise_irq(epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no,
> -				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX, irq);
> +				  PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSIX, reg->irq_number);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to raise IRQ, unknown type\n");
> @@ -677,8 +675,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_FAIL;
>  		else
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_SUCCESS;
> -		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg->irq_type,
> -				       reg->irq_number);
> +		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
>  		goto reset_handler;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -688,8 +685,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_READ_SUCCESS;
>  		else
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_READ_FAIL;
> -		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg->irq_type,
> -				       reg->irq_number);
> +		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
>  		goto reset_handler;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -699,8 +695,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_SUCCESS;
>  		else
>  			reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_FAIL;
> -		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg->irq_type,
> -				       reg->irq_number);
> +		pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
>  		goto reset_handler;
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-15 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08  9:02 [PATCH v2 00/16] PCI endpoint fixes and improvements Damien Le Moal
2023-03-08  9:02 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: endpoint: Automatically create a function specific attributes group Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 14:27   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:02 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: endpoint: Move pci_epf_type_add_cfs() code Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:01   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion initialization Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:03   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion detection Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:20   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-15 23:46     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: epf-test: Use dmaengine_submit() to initiate DMA transfer Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:21   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: epf-test: Simplify read/write/copy test functions Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:24   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: epf-test: Simply pci_epf_test_raise_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:27   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: epf-test: Simplify IRQ test commands execution Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:37   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: epf-test: Improve handling of command and status registers Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:51   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-15 23:49     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-16 15:25     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-03-16 16:31       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-16 16:32   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:52   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] PCI: epf-test: Simplify dma support checks Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:57   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] PCI: epf-test: Simplify transfers result print Damien Le Moal
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Free IRQs before removing the device Damien Le Moal
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Re-init completion for every test Damien Le Moal
2023-03-15 15:55   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Do not write status in IRQ handler Damien Le Moal
2023-03-08  9:03 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Simplify pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq() Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230315152744.GI98488@thinkpad \
    --to=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).