From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046DDC761AF for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231477AbjCWPEK (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:04:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44112 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231604AbjCWPEJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:04:09 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E3528E74; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2957B8215E; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7276DC4339E; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:02:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1679583760; bh=A4cz5sAtdGojClghNnzslTTn+0telsrqWPrc7ZEY92A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=QZ2KDQiDLNeolamz/rBZXmXKaml10w90GcGwB6l5yO87qYFqQPDIQgKZ80zht8Qsc Xeoi/zLrt2EtH3nbngx/R5sYZx0Xwf4JkO9knqHSrKtOYd2+7MSeapV8B/zw9rxmZf 9UhNHPKZpA1ucTpj/VgulfE/ACFQnVZP8YBw36pan4Gf8wwyvTOnEEDjDM2KPQPTQp ZGCnVZCISmiqwx5zKNrKd8Mk7Zh6u/0oYwI8LPRfc1PEUXu67DDtdxfqNx9ryyF1pw 4cNq1h1H67JIwrFngX1Sl9ypuAP/OCB5kx8wJtxg7nOzQYMGU2gbmFC/O67YEr6JCJ aHqE0tG0UVQoQ== Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:02:38 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= , Mika Westerberg , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Michael Ellerman , Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Niklas Schnelle , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Juergen Gross , Dominik Brodowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Miguel Ojeda , Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Gregory Clement , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Anatolij Gustschin , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , "David S. Miller" , Bjorn Helgaas , Stefano Stabellini , Oleksandr Tyshchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] PCI: Introduce pci_dev_for_each_resource() Message-ID: <20230323150238.GA2550157@bhelgaas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 02:28:04PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:16:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > ... > > > > + pci_dev_for_each_resource_p(dev, r) { > > > /* zap the 2nd function of the winbond chip */ > > > - if (dev->resource[i].flags & IORESOURCE_IO > > > - && dev->bus->number == 0 && dev->devfn == 0x81) > > > - dev->resource[i].flags &= ~IORESOURCE_IO; > > > - if (dev->resource[i].start == 0 && dev->resource[i].end) { > > > - dev->resource[i].flags = 0; > > > - dev->resource[i].end = 0; > > > + if (dev->bus->number == 0 && dev->devfn == 0x81 && > > > + r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) > > > > This is a nice literal conversion, but it's kind of lame to test > > bus->number and devfn *inside* the loop here, since they can't change > > inside the loop. > > Hmm... why are you asking me, even if I may agree on that? It's > in the original code and out of scope of this series. Yeah, I don't think it would be *unreasonable* to clean this up at the same time so the maintainers can look at both at the same time (this is arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pci.c, so Michael, et al), but no need for you to do anything, certainly. I can post a follow-up patch. > > but > > since we're converging on the "(dev, res)" style, I think we should > > reverse the names so we have something like: > > > > pci_dev_for_each_resource(dev, res) > > pci_dev_for_each_resource_idx(dev, res, i) > > Wouldn't it be more churn, including pci_bus_for_each_resource() correction? Yes, it definitely is a little more churn because we already have pci_bus_for_each_resource() that would have to be changed. I poked around looking for similar patterns elsewhere with: git grep "#define.*for_each_.*_p(" git grep "#define.*for_each_.*_idx(" I didn't find any other "_p" iterators and just a few "_idx" ones, so my hope is to follow what little precedent there is, as well as converge on the basic "*_for_each_resource()" iterators and remove the "_idx()" versions over time by doing things like the pci_claim_resource() change. What do you think? If it seems like excessive churn, we can do it as-is and still try to reduce the use of the index variable over time. Bjorn