From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/17] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup request result handling
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:58:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230331052827.GC4973@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230330085357.2653599-12-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 05:53:51PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> Each of the test functions pci_epf_test_write(), pci_epf_test_read() and
> pci_epf_test_copy() return an int result which is used by
> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() to set a success or error bit in the request
> status.
>
> In the spirit of keeping the processing of each test case self-contained
> within its own test function, move the request status field update from
> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() to each of these test functions and change
> these functions declaration to returning void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
- Mani
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 46 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index c2a14f828bdf..35bdb03f6ee1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -325,8 +325,8 @@ static void pci_epf_test_print_rate(const char *ops, u64 size,
> (u64)ts.tv_sec, (u32)ts.tv_nsec, rate / 1024);
> }
>
> -static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> - struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> +static void pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> + struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> {
> int ret;
> bool use_dma;
> @@ -420,11 +420,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, src_phys_addr, src_addr, reg->size);
>
> err:
> - return ret;
> + if (!ret)
> + reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_SUCCESS;
> + else
> + reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_FAIL;
> }
>
> -static int pci_epf_test_read(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> - struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> +static void pci_epf_test_read(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> + struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> {
> int ret;
> void __iomem *src_addr;
> @@ -509,11 +512,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_read(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, phys_addr, src_addr, reg->size);
>
> err:
> - return ret;
> + if (!ret)
> + reg->status |= STATUS_READ_SUCCESS;
> + else
> + reg->status |= STATUS_READ_FAIL;
> }
>
> -static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> - struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> +static void pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> + struct pci_epf_test_reg *reg)
> {
> int ret;
> void __iomem *dst_addr;
> @@ -604,7 +610,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, phys_addr, dst_addr, reg->size);
>
> err:
> - return ret;
> + if (!ret)
> + reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_SUCCESS;
> + else
> + reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_FAIL;
> }
>
> static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
> @@ -655,7 +664,6 @@ static void pci_epf_test_raise_irq(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
>
> static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - int ret;
> u32 command;
> struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = container_of(work, struct pci_epf_test,
> cmd_handler.work);
> @@ -683,27 +691,15 @@ static void pci_epf_test_cmd_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
> break;
> case COMMAND_WRITE:
> - ret = pci_epf_test_write(epf_test, reg);
> - if (ret)
> - reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_FAIL;
> - else
> - reg->status |= STATUS_WRITE_SUCCESS;
> + pci_epf_test_write(epf_test, reg);
> pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
> break;
> case COMMAND_READ:
> - ret = pci_epf_test_read(epf_test, reg);
> - if (!ret)
> - reg->status |= STATUS_READ_SUCCESS;
> - else
> - reg->status |= STATUS_READ_FAIL;
> + pci_epf_test_read(epf_test, reg);
> pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
> break;
> case COMMAND_COPY:
> - ret = pci_epf_test_copy(epf_test, reg);
> - if (!ret)
> - reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_SUCCESS;
> - else
> - reg->status |= STATUS_COPY_FAIL;
> + pci_epf_test_copy(epf_test, reg);
> pci_epf_test_raise_irq(epf_test, reg);
> break;
> default:
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-31 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-30 8:53 [PATCH v4 00/17] PCI endpoint fixes and improvements Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] PCI: endpoint: Automatically create a function specific attributes group Damien Le Moal
2023-03-31 5:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-31 7:16 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 15:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-15 0:55 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] PCI: endpoint: Move pci_epf_type_add_cfs() code Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion initialization Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] PCI: epf-test: Fix DMA transfer completion detection Damien Le Moal
2023-03-31 5:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-04-04 9:47 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-04-04 10:16 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-04-04 10:30 ` Shunsuke Mie
2023-04-13 1:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 15:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-14 15:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-04-14 16:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] PCI: epf-test: Use dmaengine_submit() to initiate DMA transfer Damien Le Moal
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify read/write/copy test functions Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_raise_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify IRQ test commands execution Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:09 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] PCI: epf-test: Improve handling of command and status registers Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] PCI: epf-test: Cleanup request result handling Damien Le Moal
2023-03-31 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify DMA support checks Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] PCI: epf-test: Simplify transfers result print Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Free IRQs before removing the device Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Re-init completion for every test Damien Le Moal
2023-03-31 5:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Do not write status in IRQ handler Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-03-30 8:53 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Simplify pci_endpoint_test_msi_irq() Damien Le Moal
2023-04-14 16:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230331052827.GC4973@thinkpad \
--to=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).