From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
"Nicolas Saenz Julienne" <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Phil Elwell" <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] PCI: brcmstb: Don't assume 2711 bootloader leaves PERST# asserted
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 09:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230509075113.5cosbeaoykdoiefa@mraw.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230508220126.16241-5-jim2101024@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1338 bytes --]
Hi,
Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com> (2023-05-08):
> The current PCIe driver assumes PERST# is asserted when probe() is invoked.
> The reasons are as follows:
>
> (1) One Broadcom SOC (7278) causes a panic if the PERST# register is
> written during this time window.
>
> (2) If PERST# is deasserted at Linux probe() time, experience and QA
> suspend/resume tests have shown that some endpoint devices fail if the
> PERST# is pulsed (deasserted => asserted => deasserted) quickly in this
> fashion, even though the timing is in accordance with their datasheets.
>
> (3) Keeping things in reset tends to save power, if for some reason the
> PCIe driver is not yet present.
>
> Broadcom STB and CM SOCs bootloaders always have PERST# asserted at
> probe(). This is not necessarily the case for the 2711/RPi bootloader,
> so, for 2711/RPi SOCs, do what Raspian OS does and assert PERST#.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20230411165919.23955-1-jim2101024@gmail.com/T/#m39ebab8bc2827b2304aeeff470a6c6a58f46f987
It would probably make sense to remove that [1] link entirely, to match
the reference removal between v4 and v5.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-09 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-08 22:01 [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode Jim Quinlan
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add brcm,enable-l1ss property Jim Quinlan
2023-08-23 7:43 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
[not found] ` <CA+-6iNwP+NbAdm0kNxZ5GwyPdTQyOjq7E2O-+mCU4fG-94BKBA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-08-23 18:16 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-24 10:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-08-24 14:55 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-08-25 6:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-08-25 18:16 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-08-29 12:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-08-29 14:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure HW CLKREQ# mode appropriate for downstream device Jim Quinlan
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] PCI: brcmstb: Set higher value for internal bus timeout Jim Quinlan
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] PCI: brcmstb: Don't assume 2711 bootloader leaves PERST# asserted Jim Quinlan
2023-05-09 7:51 ` Cyril Brulebois [this message]
2023-05-09 11:19 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-05-10 22:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-10 22:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-10 22:46 ` Jim Quinlan
2023-05-10 23:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-08 22:01 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: brcmstb: Remove stale comment Jim Quinlan
2023-05-08 22:02 ` Florian Fainelli
2023-05-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] PCI: brcmstb: Configure appropriate HW CLKREQ# mode Cyril Brulebois
2023-05-09 11:22 ` Jim Quinlan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230509075113.5cosbeaoykdoiefa@mraw.org \
--to=kibi@debian.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).