linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	Michael Bottini <michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable ASPM on external PCIe devices
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 17:01:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230616220125.GA1555182@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230615070421.1704133-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>

On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 03:04:20PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> When a PCIe device is hotplugged to a Thunderbolt port, ASPM is not
> enabled for that device. However, when the device is plugged preboot,
> ASPM is enabled by default.
> 
> The disparity happens because BIOS doesn't have the ability to program
> ASPM on hotplugged devices.
> 
> So enable ASPM by default for external connected PCIe devices so ASPM
> settings are consitent between preboot and hotplugged.
> 
> On HP Thunderbolt Dock G4, enable ASPM can also fix BadDLLP error:
> pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Corrected error received: 0000:07:04.0
> pcieport 0000:07:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> pcieport 0000:07:04.0:   device [8086:0b26] error status/mask=00000080/00002000
> pcieport 0000:07:04.0:    [ 7] BadDLLP
> 
> The root cause is still unclear, but quite likely because the I225 on
> the dock supports PTM, where ASPM timing is precalculated for the PTM.

> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217557

I know you said this isn't clear yet, but I don't see a connection
between ASPM being enabled and PTM.  If anything, *disabling* ASPM
should be safer if there's a timing issue.  

I assume the ASPM timing you refer to is the LTR snoop/no snoop
latency, since that's the only timing difference I see in the lspci
output in bugzilla?

I don't see any PTM differences there.

Bjorn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-16 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-15  7:04 [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable ASPM on external PCIe devices Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-15 14:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-06-15 17:07 ` Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
2023-06-16  2:37   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-15 17:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-16  3:01   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-19 16:16     ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-19 21:37       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-19 22:09         ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-20 18:28           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-20 18:36             ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-06-22 23:06               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-27  8:35                 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-27 20:54                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-28  5:09                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-07-05 20:06                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-07-06  4:07                         ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-14  8:17                           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-07-14 16:37                             ` Mario Limonciello
2023-07-17  3:34                               ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-07-17 16:51                                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2023-07-18 19:24                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-11  8:34                                     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2023-06-16 22:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-06-21  3:08   ` Kai-Heng Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230616220125.GA1555182@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).