From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczynski" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: dwc: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:03:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230713170355.GA323073@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8715f2b298c04422db311666eb2409464c29458b.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 11:04:50PM -0400, Radu Rendec wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 17:11 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> ...
> > If converting from chained to normal handlers can be done safely, I
> > would definitely be in favor if doing it across all of drivers/pci/ at
> > once so they're all consistent. Otherwise that code just gets copied
> > to new drivers, so the issue persists and spreads.
>
> I think the conversion can be done safely, meaning that it won't break
> the drivers. And by the way, there are other IRQ drivers (outside the
> PCI space) that use chained interrupts.
>
> Unfortunately, it seems we are going in circles. Chained interrupts are
> bad because they let IRQ storms go unnoticed and lock up the system,
> but converting them to regular interrupts is also bad because it breaks
> the userspace ABI.
>
> I am willing to help clean up this mess, but I think first we need to
> come up with a solution that's acceptable for everybody. I was hoping
> Marc and Thomas would chime in, but unfortunately that hasn't happened
> yet - other than each of them pointing out (separately) what is wrong
> with each approach.
I don't think Marc or Thomas are going to chime in with a fully-formed
solution. I think to make progress, you (or Pali, or somebody) will
have to try to address Marc and Thomas' comments, make a proposal, and
we can iterate on it.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-13 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 18:30 [PATCH 0/1] PCI: dwc: Use regular interrupt instead of chained Radu Rendec
2023-06-29 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Radu Rendec
2023-06-29 19:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-29 20:42 ` Radu Rendec
2023-06-29 20:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-29 21:27 ` Radu Rendec
2023-06-29 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-06-30 3:04 ` Radu Rendec
2023-07-13 17:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-07-13 20:26 ` Radu Rendec
2023-11-21 21:57 ` Radu Rendec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230713170355.GA323073@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox