From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Sui@freedesktop.org, Jingfeng@loongson.cn,
Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PCI/VGA: Deal with PCI VGA compatible devices only
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:26:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719182617.GA509912@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711134354.755966-3-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 09:43:50PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
>
> Currently, vgaarb only cares about PCI VGA-compatible class devices.
>
> While vga_arbiter_del_pci_device() gets called unbalanced when some PCI
> device is about to be removed. This happens even during the boot process.
The previous code calls vga_arbiter_add_pci_device() for every device
(every device present at boot and also every hot-added device). It
only allocates a vga_device if pdev->class is 0x0300XX.
It calls vga_arbiter_del_pci_device() for every device removal. It
does nothing unless it finds a vga_device.
This seems symmetric and reasonable to me. Did you observe a problem
with it?
> Another reason is that the vga_arb_device_init() function is not efficient.
> Since we only care about VGA-compatible devices (pdev->class == 0x030000),
> We could filter the unqualified devices out in the vga_arb_device_init()
> function. While the current implementation is to search all PCI devices
> in a system, this is not necessary.
Optimization is fine, but the most important thing here is to be clear
about what functional change this patch makes. As I mentioned at [1],
if this patch affects the class codes accepted, please make that clear
here.
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
I do not see Mario's Reviewed-by on the list. I do see Mario's
Reviewed-by [2] for a previous version, but that version added this in
pci_notify():
+ if (pdev->class != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8)
+ return 0;
while this version adds:
+ if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
+ return 0;
It's OK to carry a review to future versions if there are
insignificant changes, but this is a functional change that seems
significant to me. The first matches only 0x030000, while the second
discards the low eight bits so it matches 0x0300XX.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230718231400.GA496927@bhelgaas
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/5b6fdf65-b354-94a9-f883-be820157efad@amd.com/
> ---
> drivers/pci/vgaarb.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c b/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
> index c1bc6c983932..021116ed61cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/vgaarb.c
> @@ -754,10 +754,6 @@ static bool vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct pci_dev *bridge;
> u16 cmd;
>
> - /* Only deal with VGA class devices */
> - if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
> - return false;
> -
> /* Allocate structure */
> vgadev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vga_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (vgadev == NULL) {
> @@ -1502,6 +1498,10 @@ static int pci_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>
> vgaarb_dbg(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
>
> + /* Deal with VGA compatible devices only */
> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA)
> + return 0;
> +
> /* For now we're only intereted in devices added and removed. I didn't
> * test this thing here, so someone needs to double check for the
> * cases of hotplugable vga cards. */
> @@ -1534,8 +1534,8 @@ static struct miscdevice vga_arb_device = {
>
> static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void)
> {
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> int rc;
> - struct pci_dev *pdev;
>
> rc = misc_register(&vga_arb_device);
> if (rc < 0)
> @@ -1543,13 +1543,14 @@ static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void)
>
> bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &pci_notifier);
>
> - /* We add all PCI devices satisfying VGA class in the arbiter by
> - * default */
> - pdev = NULL;
> - while ((pdev =
> - pci_get_subsys(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
> - PCI_ANY_ID, pdev)) != NULL)
> - vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev);
> + /*
> + * We add all PCI VGA compatible devices in the arbiter by default
> + */
> + do {
> + pdev = pci_get_class(PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA << 8, pdev);
> + if (pdev)
> + vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev);
> + } while (pdev);
>
> pr_info("loaded\n");
> return rc;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 13:43 [PATCH 0/6] PCI/VGA: Fix typos, comments and copyright Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI/VGA: Use unsigned type for the io_state variable Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI/VGA: Deal with PCI VGA compatible devices only Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-19 18:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2023-07-19 19:58 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-19 20:06 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-19 20:08 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-19 20:16 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-19 21:13 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-19 21:27 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-22 8:11 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-25 21:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-08-01 7:17 ` Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI/VGA: drop the inline of vga_update_device_decodes() function Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-24 13:02 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI/VGA: Move the new_state assignment out the loop Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-24 13:02 ` suijingfeng
2023-07-25 21:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI/VGA: Tidy up the code and comment format Sui Jingfeng
2023-07-11 13:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI/VGA: Replace full MIT license text with SPDX identifier Sui Jingfeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230719182617.GA509912@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Jingfeng@loongson.cn \
--cc=Sui@freedesktop.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sui.jingfeng@linux.dev \
--cc=suijingfeng@loongson.cn \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).