From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, lukas@wunner.de,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
kch@nvidia.com, logang@deltatee.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE protocols via sysfs
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 07:05:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2023081005-ground-muster-63c8@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230809232851.1004023-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 07:28:51PM -0400, Alistair Francis wrote:
> The PCIe 6 specification added support for the Data Object Exchange (DOE).
> When DOE is supported the Discovery Data Object Protocol must be
> implemented. The protocol allows a requester to obtain information about
> the other DOE protocols supported by the device.
>
> The kernel is already querying the DOE protocols supported and cacheing
> the values. This patch exposes the values via sysfs. This will allow
> userspace to determine which DOE protocols are supported by the PCIe
> device.
>
> By exposing the information to userspace tools like lspci can relay the
> information to users. By listing all of the supported protocols we can
> allow userspace to parse and support the list, which might include
> vendor specific protocols as well as yet to be supported protocols.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Expose each DOE feature as a separate file
But you don't actually have anything in the sysfs files, why not?
> --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ struct pci_doe_mb {
> wait_queue_head_t wq;
> struct workqueue_struct *work_queue;
> unsigned long flags;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> + struct device_attribute *sysfs_attrs;
> +#endif
Please don't put #ifdefs in .c files if you can prevent it. I think
this will work just fine if you don't have the #ifdef. And who would be
using pci without sysfs?
> + attrs[i].attr.mode = 0444;
> + attrs[i].show = NULL;
Why set to NULL something that is already NULL? Did you just forget to
actually set the proper show callback here?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOE
> + retval = doe_sysfs_init(pdev);
> + if (retval)
> + return retval;
> +#endif
Again, no #ifdef in .c files please, put this in the .h file like
normal.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 23:28 [PATCH v3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE protocols via sysfs Alistair Francis
2023-08-09 23:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-08-10 0:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-08-10 5:05 ` Greg KH [this message]
2023-08-10 7:44 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-08-10 7:48 ` Greg KH
2023-08-10 7:34 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-08-10 15:34 ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-12 8:15 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-08-12 8:26 ` Greg KH
2023-08-15 13:44 ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-15 15:11 ` Greg KH
2023-08-15 19:50 ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-15 20:10 ` Greg KH
2023-08-17 19:41 ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-17 20:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2023081005-ground-muster-63c8@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).