From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
iain@orangesquash.org.uk,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 2/2] PCI: Add a quirk for AMD PCIe root ports w/ USB4 controllers
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:08:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230915070802.GA5934@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915023354.939-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:33:54PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> +static bool child_has_amd_usb4(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *child = NULL;
> +
> + while ((child = pci_get_class(PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_USB4, child))) {
> + if (child->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD)
> + continue;
> + if (pcie_find_root_port(child) != pdev)
> + continue;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
What's the purpose of the pcie_find_root_port() check? PCI is a hierarchy,
not a graph, so a device cannot have any other Root Port but the one below
which you're searching.
If the purpose is to check that the port is a Root Port (if the PCI IDs
you're using in the DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_* clauses match non-Root Ports),
check for pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT. (No need to
check for that in every loop iteration obviously, just check once in
the fixup.)
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 2:33 [PATCH v19 0/2] Add quirk for PCIe root port on AMD systems Mario Limonciello
2023-09-15 2:33 ` [PATCH v19 1/2] PCI: Move the `PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_USB4` definition to common header Mario Limonciello
2023-09-15 2:33 ` [PATCH v19 2/2] PCI: Add a quirk for AMD PCIe root ports w/ USB4 controllers Mario Limonciello
2023-09-15 7:08 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2023-09-15 12:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-16 4:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-16 13:09 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-16 13:36 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-16 14:00 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-17 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-18 1:02 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-18 7:01 ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-17 21:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-09-18 1:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-09-18 11:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230915070802.GA5934@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=iain@orangesquash.org.uk \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox