linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Minghuan Lian" <minghuan.Lian@nxp.com>,
	"Mingkai Hu" <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>, "Roy Zang" <roy.zang@nxp.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"open list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
	<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:PCI DRIVER FOR FREESCALE LAYERSCAPE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: layerscape: add suspend/resume for ls1043a
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 22:37:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231016170706.GG39962@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915184306.2374670-3-Frank.Li@nxp.com>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:43:06PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> ls1043a add suspend/resume support.
> 

Same comment as previous patch for patch description.

> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> index bc5a8ff1a26ce..debabb9bb41f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,20 @@
>  #define SCFG_PEXSFTRSTCR	0x190
>  #define PEXSR(idx)		BIT(idx)
>  
> +/* LS1043A PEX PME control register */
> +#define SCFG_PEXPMECR		0x144
> +#define PEXPME(idx)		BIT(31 - (idx) * 4)
> +
> +/* LS1043A PEX LUT debug register */
> +#define LS_PCIE_LDBG	0x7fc
> +#define LDBG_SR		BIT(30)
> +#define LDBG_WE		BIT(31)
> +
>  #define PCIE_IATU_NUM		6
>  
>  struct ls_pcie_drvdata {
>  	const u32 pf_off;
> +	const u32 lut_off;
>  	const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
>  	void (*exit_from_l2)(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp);
>  	bool pm_support;
> @@ -54,6 +64,7 @@ struct ls_pcie {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci;
>  	const struct ls_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
>  	void __iomem *pf_base;
> +	void __iomem *lut_base;
>  	struct regmap *scfg;
>  	int index;
>  	bool big_endian;
> @@ -116,6 +127,23 @@ static void ls_pcie_pf_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
>  		iowrite32(val, pcie->pf_base + off);
>  }
>  
> +static u32 ls_pcie_lut_readl(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +{

Looking at ls_pcie_pf_{readl/writel} you can use a common function that does the
read/write and pass the relevant base/offset. This will avoid code duplication.

> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		return ioread32be(pcie->lut_base + off);
> +
> +	return ioread32(pcie->lut_base + off);
> +}
> +
> +static void ls_pcie_lut_writel(struct ls_pcie *pcie, u32 off, u32 val)
> +{
> +	if (pcie->big_endian)
> +		iowrite32be(val, pcie->lut_base + off);
> +	else
> +		iowrite32(val, pcie->lut_base + off);
> +}
> +

Remove extra newline

> +
>  static void ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  {
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> @@ -249,6 +277,54 @@ static int ls1021a_pcie_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void ls1043a_pcie_send_turnoff_msg(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	if (!pcie->scfg) {
> +		dev_dbg(pcie->pci->dev, "SYSCFG is NULL\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Send Turn_off message */
> +	regmap_read(pcie->scfg, SCFG_PEXPMECR, &val);

If the register offset is the only difference, then you could pass the register
offset via drvdata and use the same functions.

> +	val |= PEXPME(pcie->index);
> +	regmap_write(pcie->scfg, SCFG_PEXPMECR, val);
> +
> +	/* There are not register to check ACK, so wait PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US */
> +	mdelay(PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US/1000);
> +
> +	/* Clear Turn_off message */
> +	regmap_read(pcie->scfg, SCFG_PEXPMECR, &val);
> +	val &= ~PEXPME(pcie->index);
> +	regmap_write(pcie->scfg, SCFG_PEXPMECR, val);
> +}
> +
> +static void ls1043a_pcie_exit_from_l2(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct ls_pcie *pcie = to_ls_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val;
> +

Again, a comment here would be useful.

- Mani

> +	val = ls_pcie_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG);
> +	val |= LDBG_WE;
> +	ls_pcie_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG, val);
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG);
> +	val |= LDBG_SR;
> +	ls_pcie_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG, val);
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG);
> +	val &= ~LDBG_SR;
> +	ls_pcie_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG, val);
> +
> +	val = ls_pcie_lut_readl(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG);
> +	val &= ~LDBG_WE;
> +	ls_pcie_lut_writel(pcie, LS_PCIE_LDBG, val);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops ls_pcie_host_ops = {
>  	.host_init = ls_pcie_host_init,
>  	.pme_turn_off = ls_pcie_send_turnoff_msg,
> @@ -265,6 +341,18 @@ static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1021a_drvdata = {
>  	.exit_from_l2 = ls1021a_pcie_exit_from_l2,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops ls1043a_pcie_host_ops = {
> +	.host_init = ls1021a_pcie_host_init, /* the same as ls1021 */
> +	.pme_turn_off = ls1043a_pcie_send_turnoff_msg,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata ls1043a_drvdata = {
> +	.lut_off = 0x10000,
> +	.pm_support = true,
> +	.ops = &ls1043a_pcie_host_ops,
> +	.exit_from_l2 = ls1043a_pcie_exit_from_l2,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct ls_pcie_drvdata layerscape_drvdata = {
>  	.pf_off = 0xc0000,
>  	.pm_support = true,
> @@ -275,7 +363,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021a_drvdata },
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1021a_drvdata },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043a_drvdata },
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &layerscape_drvdata },
> @@ -314,6 +402,7 @@ static int ls_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pcie->big_endian = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "big-endian");
>  
>  	pcie->pf_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->pf_off;
> +	pcie->lut_base = pci->dbi_base + pcie->drvdata->lut_off;
>  
>  	if (!ls_pcie_is_bridge(pcie))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-16 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-15 18:43 [PATCH 1/3] PCI: layerscape: add function pointer for exit_from_l2() Frank Li
2023-09-15 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: layerscape: add suspend/resume for ls1021a Frank Li
2023-10-04 14:23   ` Frank Li
2023-10-10 14:20     ` Frank Li
2023-10-10 16:02       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-16 14:45         ` Frank Li
2023-10-16 15:22           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-16 16:11             ` Frank Li
2023-10-16 16:25               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-10-16 16:59                 ` Frank Li
2023-10-16 16:25               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-16 16:12             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2023-10-16 16:58   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-10-16 20:18     ` Frank Li
2023-10-17  8:17       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-09-15 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: layerscape: add suspend/resume for ls1043a Frank Li
2023-10-16 17:07   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2023-10-16 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: layerscape: add function pointer for exit_from_l2() Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231016170706.GG39962@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).