From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5DC156DC for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="cECRBRCZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99154C433C7; Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:30:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1701624618; bh=icVOkA4ZruYQ28o6dqOjvQ4T2dTFZfkpGqbWRS9fM4I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cECRBRCZ/rVTGXQpq2pwS5nJ4DfYoHbjJ9HpEt8PSD049rinkl2OMHXLrqCMZj+an aIAT02zRJHE9Q2DkIotcE8ZOrnzx8+ar4+4/iTMwcp9jPCUMWjW8ISIb/4mWtHezn+ i7RaxFZixob4q0hSAC9wZXmuLDToEBQR1yVg/p44= Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 18:30:13 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wasim Khan , Wei Fang , Clark Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH pci] PCI: remove the PCI_VENDOR_ID_NXP alias Message-ID: <2023120354-expansion-frequency-f991@gregkh> References: <20231122154241.1371647-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> <20231129233827.GA444332@bhelgaas> <2023113014-preflight-roundish-d796@gregkh> <20231203151654.nh4ta7vtzwpwg4ss@skbuf> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231203151654.nh4ta7vtzwpwg4ss@skbuf> On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:16:54PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 11:10:19AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Why would we remove name of the current company and use the name of a > > > company that doesn't exist any more? > > > > Yes, this seems very odd. What is the reason for any of this other than > > marketing? Kernel code doesn't do marketing :) > > I'm not sure who is doing the marketing; not me, that's for sure. > The patch that I'm proposing undoes these strange aliases. Why? Who did it originally in what commit id and what was wrong with them then? thanks, greg k-h