From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C24F65A71 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iigFE0sX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2D30C433C9; Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:23:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1702416205; bh=/ixDf/FMAeVQ+/FH3AsNSPZ9BcC9ELGE9aI1dGNMoIQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=iigFE0sX/7WKAGE22E7MrW/4c+wXyqluQ6d6vh1soqeCaAKuY8p3R2ZL7ifRCIHzU 2z4n+o5thjK/+Sg3bN2ZegIK7cLBE/OG49Ee78lgIU1iyMjeMuZ3YDx3v29LPMKYKb jph+hciZcuNVcxbCRZKjqmUB3Tnm9az5BwCWdw4bkMGLH/bFwWxGZCeL7xWbJ05kqA gdcFiURxTcS4OuKVKRJgZgMSLa09fp9rCGzOdQE6q7UM7WzF/bNodABI+VNg9gxP+m ckV1V0bh4Kz7bxLcvxjWzPbwinGk51fT1aYaeZ5G0T5adHKkVNXzTTtk1pC9B83dPw 55lJ4EVvwkHGg== Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:23:23 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Terry Bowman Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Oliver O'Halloran , Robert Richter , Kai-Heng Feng , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI/AER: Use 'Correctable' and 'Uncorrectable' spec terms for errors Message-ID: <20231212212323.GA1021034@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:00:24AM -0600, Terry Bowman wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Will help prevent confusion. LGTM. Thanks a lot for taking a look at these! I'd like to give you credit in the log, e.g., "Reviewed-by: Terry Bowman ", but I'm OCD enough that I don't want to translate "LGTM" into that all by myself. If you want that credit (and, I guess, the privilege of being cc'd when we find that these patches break something :)), just reply again with that actual "Reviewed-by:" text in it. Bjorn