linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczy??ski <kw@linux.com>,
	Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
	Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] PCI: Cache PCIe device's Supported Speed Vector
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 16:19:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231230151931.GA25718@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929115723.7864-7-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:57:19PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The Supported Link Speeds Vector in the Link Capabilities Register 2
> corresponds to the bus below on Root Ports and Downstream Ports,
> whereas it corresponds to the bus above on Upstream Ports and
> Endpoints.

It would be good to add a pointer to the spec here.  I think the
relevant section is PCIe r6.1 sec 7.5.3.18 which says:

 "Supported Link Speeds Vector - This field indicates the supported
  Link speed(s) of the associated Port."
                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Obviously the associated port is upstream on a Switch Upstream Port
or Endpoint, whereas it is downstream on a Switch Downstream Port
or Root Port.

Come to think of it, what about edge cases such as RCiEPs?


> Only the former is currently cached in pcie_bus_speeds in
> the struct pci_bus. The link speeds that are supported is the
> intersection of these two.

I'm wondering if caching both is actually necessary.  Why not cache
just the intersection?  Do we need either of the two somewhere?


> Store the device's Supported Link Speeds Vector into the struct pci_bus
> when the Function 0 is enumerated (the Multi-Function Devices must have
> same speeds the same for all Functions) to be easily able to calculate
> the intersection of Supported Link Speeds.

Might want to add an explanation what you're going to need this for,
I assume it's accessed frequently by the bandwidth throttling driver
in a subsequent patch?

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-30 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-29 11:57 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add PCIe Bandwidth Controller Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] PCI: Protect Link Control 2 Register with RMW locking Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 10:33   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm/radeon: Use RMW accessors for changing LNKCTL2 Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/amdgpu: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] RDMA/hfi1: " Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 13:03   ` Dean Luick
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] PCI: Store all PCIe Supported Link Speeds Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 11:45   ` Lukas Wunner
2023-12-30 19:30     ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-01 16:26       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-01 16:40         ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-01 16:53           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] PCI: Cache PCIe device's Supported Speed Vector Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 15:19   ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2024-01-01 18:31     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-03 16:51       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] PCI/LINK: Re-add BW notification portdrv as PCIe BW controller Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 15:58   ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-01 17:37     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-01 18:11       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] PCI/bwctrl: Add "controller" part into PCIe bwctrl Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 18:49   ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-01 18:12     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-03 16:40       ` Lukas Wunner
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] thermal: Add PCIe cooling driver Ilpo Järvinen
2023-12-30 19:08   ` Lukas Wunner
2024-01-01 16:39     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] selftests/pcie_bwctrl: Create selftests Ilpo Järvinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231230151931.GA25718@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=amitk@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).