From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFB6FBE1; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 22:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="m4KseXHX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1F61C433C8; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 22:15:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704147359; bh=vaYP09n7NQRCkMOIIM0dBoEGJ1KUL9tEiUtSqhELX54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=m4KseXHX5wx9q+NQWukSufL8Ons5NIm6HUAxspt2Me2WIKQipZ9Qowhs7quVQr10r 8jAFoZMMYgEEPZ82kdzVkgzCmYnJ5SHN04u8ud42C65GbLqbxjQDuJyiaiwLtt69cR H/Nil9ta+37qrsLjFCq00dxafC7WQv5M4EppNgPJTe0fI7fcszB4zjTy64DeU3LUMz qqAQ+mWPYEOqEn9SAiUL7V+P/bc4HRnul80OcdVxW+ljf7eJ1NuakXbr8F8AAwqSj2 wdi9gt/2ovYjHyUxbf7MCYxFHI2MPqlqDUJLOlAjbw9ZG43AGbDJh44jiE7/oP2bWX gvZ5IKHMux54Q== Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 16:15:54 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Michael Schaller Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, kai.heng.feng@canonical.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, macro@orcam.me.uk, ajayagarwal@google.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com, michael.a.bottini@linux.intel.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org Subject: Re: [Regression] [PCI/ASPM] [ASUS PN51] Reboot on resume attempt (bisect done; commit found) Message-ID: <20240101221554.GA1693060@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0f121140-e5dc-4c1a-b510-a9d791004a27@5challer.de> On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 07:57:40PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote: > On 01.01.24 19:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 07:29:02PM +0100, Michael Schaller wrote: > > ... > > So unless somebody has a counter-argument, I plan to queue a revert of > > 08d0cc5f3426 ("PCI/ASPM: Remove pcie_aspm_pm_state_change()") for > > v6.7. > > If it helps I could also try if a partial revert of 08d0cc5f3426 would be > sufficient. This might also narrow down the issue and give more insight > where the issue originates from. We're so close to the v6.7 final release that I doubt we can figure out the problem and test a fix before v6.7. I'm sure Kai-Heng would appreciate any additional data, but I don't think it's urgent at this point. Bjorn