Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
To: <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<treding@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <kthota@nvidia.com>,
	<mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>, <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	<sagar.tv@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] PCI: Clear errors logged in Secondary Status Register
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 20:02:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240116143258.483235-1-vidyas@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104013229.693041-1-vidyas@nvidia.com>

The enumeration process leaves the 'Received Master Abort' bit set in
the Secondary Status Register of the downstream port in the following
scenarios.

(1) The device connected to the downstream port has ARI capability
    and that makes the kernel set the 'ARI Forwarding Enable' bit in
    the Device Control 2 Register of the downstream port. This
    effectively makes the downstream port forward the configuration
    requests targeting the devices downstream of it, even though they
    don't exist in reality. It causes the downstream devices return
    completions with UR set in the status in turn causing 'Received
    Master Abort' bit set.

    In contrast, if the downstream device doesn't have ARI capability,
    the 'ARI Forwarding Enable' bit in the downstream port is not set
    and any configuration requests targeting the downstream devices
    that don't exist are terminated (section 6.13 of PCI Express Base
    6.0 spec) in the downstream port itself resulting in no change of
    the 'Received Master Abort' bit.

(2) A PCIe switch is connected to the downstream port and when the
    enumeration flow tries to explore the presence of devices that
    don't really exist downstream of the switch, the downstream
    port receives the completions with UR set causing the 'Received
    Master Abort' bit set.

Clear 'Received Master Abort' bit to keep the bridge device in a clean
state post enumeration.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
---
V2:
* Changed commit message based on Bjorn's feedback

 drivers/pci/probe.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 795534589b98..640d2871b061 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1470,6 +1470,9 @@ static int pci_scan_bridge_extend(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev,
 	}
 
 out:
+	/* Clear errors in the Secondary Status Register */
+	pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_SEC_STATUS, 0xffff);
+
 	pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, bctl);
 
 	pm_runtime_put(&dev->dev);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-16 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04  1:32 [PATCH V1] PCI: Clear errors logged in Secondary Status Register Vidya Sagar
2024-01-12 13:57 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-12 17:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-16 13:54   ` Vidya Sagar
2024-01-16 14:32 ` Vidya Sagar [this message]
2024-01-22 23:00   ` [PATCH V2] " Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-14  0:39     ` Vidya Sagar
2024-04-01  7:59       ` Vidya Sagar
2024-04-18 10:52         ` Vidya Sagar
2024-04-23 21:09   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240116143258.483235-1-vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --to=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox