From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail5.25mail.st (mail5.25mail.st [74.50.62.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47115C133; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 06:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.50.62.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707116400; cv=none; b=HxGlW41j6Gn+uUyD06o3Uwa+AUWRf9Uk5uGcfg5fTqjzZOTffbygLrRRKvPH+Hl+wTO9paGeXyw3erhG2rRWkOkLW4RjDG1DleUyy7GctS/uv8xlTzbzD0dTBfe+29sFqbyRk7vnFypwGHdFc4HeHJQzobGRs0zZNqKvvrV41Ys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707116400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zt0C46DodJBw5mMiz+hdsd1ggKvdZL8FZ+OjMed37Rk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oSOaa94oOx/C4iuMWjIHLgH79pacR2wabZ/CbSlU8zTGY+iT4WqzdISN8uYvfC//6QH1k978l9Nwou6b87t690k8/+c5+gdIZJom7LYssHxAjA7PJjE/dkHuCF+eUL39P3AlsvhPn+v6StOmDvzUamVAnF5VSr6+TDAIndjVdgE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=atomide.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=atomide.com header.i=@atomide.com header.b=tH36ZgQu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.50.62.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=atomide.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=atomide.com header.i=@atomide.com header.b="tH36ZgQu" Received: from localhost (91-158-86-216.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.158.86.216]) by mail5.25mail.st (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3015060461; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 06:58:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=atomide.com; s=25mailst; t=1707116398; bh=zt0C46DodJBw5mMiz+hdsd1ggKvdZL8FZ+OjMed37Rk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tH36ZgQuTy82CmmwbwrfaK6mcnilerxyth/pAfkT84LOG4s04CTqsIidYWsJCJTc1 apeqTj9Ms8UG356uohWBjDVKt31g8C9hKjXd7dhaVjMRHC3ertJwBG9ydwEbnNDt8e CQhDuXlo0wPxJWJJd/UVIVCM/J0Tfktzoh6ampZMQQ9nv5xQRb1TblzH3KgH3RF5Ip M9zqc2fCDXTlZz5Skz7zQs2Jo9X7tgWF6JXlp++gtHN6gZPY6N0Ae2TkQjZSqoYlHl uGD7cs673Ujl6skOSecx0oIAZe6gCl8kskqZ5oA6cQj2GxY8GYx4dc+Pmezp51aRAF Y4Wr2WQsVmz/A== Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:58:48 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Thomas Richard Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , Haojian Zhuang , Vignesh R , Aaro Koskinen , Janusz Krzysztofik , Andi Shyti , Peter Rosin , Vinod Koul , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Philipp Zabel , Tom Joseph , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, gregory.clement@bootlin.com, theo.lebrun@bootlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, u-kumar1@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] gpio: pca953x: move suspend()/resume() to suspend_noirq()/resume_noirq() Message-ID: <20240205065848.GC5185@atomide.com> References: <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v2-0-8e4f7d228ec2@bootlin.com> <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v2-1-8e4f7d228ec2@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240102-j7200-pcie-s2r-v2-1-8e4f7d228ec2@bootlin.com> * Thomas Richard [240126 14:37]: > Some IOs can be needed during suspend_noirq()/resume_noirq(). > So move suspend()/resume() to noirq. Hmm so what happened to the earlier i2c transfer at noirq level comments from me and Linus W here? It seems the cover letter mentions it but I don't see the related changes in this patch? Regards, Tony