linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ajay Agarwal" <ajayagarwal@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"Johan Hovold" <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Manu Gautam" <manugautam@google.com>,
	"Doug Zobel" <zobel@google.com>,
	"William McVicker" <willmcvicker@google.com>,
	"Serge Semin" <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] PCI: dwc: Wait for link up only if link is started
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:43:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240219141341.GD3281@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240217000723.GA1294711@bhelgaas>

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:07:23PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:39:08PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 04:02:28PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 10:40:43PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > 
> > > > ... And for your usecase, allowing the controller driver to
> > > > start the link post boot just because a device on your Pixel
> > > > phone comes up later is not a good argument. You _should_not_
> > > > define the behavior of a controller driver based on one
> > > > platform, it is really a bad design.
> > > 
> > > I haven't followed the entire discussion, and I don't know much
> > > about the specifics of Ajay's situation, but from the controller
> > > driver's point of view, shouldn't a device coming up later look
> > > like a normal hot-add?
> > 
> > Yes, but most of the form factors that these drivers work with do
> > not support native hotplug. So users have to rescan the bus through
> > sysfs.
> > 
> > > I think most drivers are designed with the assumption that
> > > Endpoints are present and powered up at the time of host
> > > controller probe, which seems a little stronger than necessary.
> > 
> > Most of the drivers work with endpoints that are fixed in the board
> > design (like M.2), so the endpoints would be up when the controller
> > probes.
> >
> > > I think the host controller probe should initialize the Root Port
> > > such that its LTSSM enters the Detect state, and that much should
> > > be basically straight-line code with no waiting.  If no Endpoint
> > > is attached, i.e., "the slot is empty", it would be nice if the
> > > probe could then complete immediately without waiting at all.
> > 
> > Atleast on Qcom platforms, the LTSSM would be in "Detect" state even
> > if no endpoints are found during probe. Then once an endpoint comes
> > up later, link training happens and user can rescan the bus through
> > sysfs.
> 
> Can the hardware tell us when the link state changes?  If so, we
> should be able to scan the bus automatically without the need for
> sysfs.  For example, if the Root Port advertised PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT, 
> we might be able to use a Data Link Layer State Changed interrupt to
> scan the bus via pciehp when the Endpoint is powered up, even if the
> Endpoint is actually soldered down and not physically hot-pluggable.
> 

I don't think the state change interrupt is generated on Qcom platforms. I will
check with the hw team and reply back.

As a reply to my earlier question on requiring 1s delay for waiting for the link
to come up during boot:

PCIe spec r5, sec 6.6.1 says:

"Unless Readiness Notifications mechanisms are used, the Root Complex and/or
system software must allow at least 1.0 s after a Conventional Reset of a
device, before determining that the device is broken if it fails to return
a Successful Completion status for a valid Configuration Request. This period is
independent of how quickly Link training completes."

So this might be the reason. If so, I don't see a way to avoid the delay.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-19 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-12  9:30 [PATCH v5] PCI: dwc: Wait for link up only if link is started Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-18 18:15 ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-19  7:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-19 17:59   ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-20 14:34     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-29  6:51       ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-29  7:10         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-29  8:04           ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-29  8:12             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-29 13:26               ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-30  6:45                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-30  9:00                   ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-30 12:29                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-30 17:18                       ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-01-30 18:36                         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-05 11:00                           ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-02-06 17:10                             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-14 22:02                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-15 14:09                                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-17  0:07                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-19 14:13                                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-02-22  4:30                                   ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-02-28  2:55                                     ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-02-20 17:34                               ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-02-28 17:29                                 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-06 12:00                                   ` Ajay Agarwal
2024-03-10 13:51                                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14  9:15                                       ` Ajay Agarwal
2025-02-14  9:18                                         ` Johan Hovold
2025-02-14  9:42                                           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 10:02                                             ` Ajay Agarwal
2025-02-14 13:39                                               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-02-14 18:38                                                 ` William McVicker
2025-02-19 17:46                                                   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-31 23:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-01  3:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-02-01  7:32       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-02-01  8:37         ` Lei Chuan Hua
2024-01-19 20:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-24  9:24   ` Ajay Agarwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240219141341.GD3281@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
    --cc=ajayagarwal@google.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manugautam@google.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
    --cc=zobel@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).