From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Shradha Todi" <shradha.t@samsung.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_alloc_space() loop
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:59:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240315052906.GD3375@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240313105804.100168-5-cassel@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:57:56AM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Make pci-epf-test use pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() just like pci-epf-ntb.c
> and pci-epf-vntb.c.
>
> Using pci_epc_get_next_free_bar() also makes it more obvious that
> pci-epf-test does no special configuration at all.
>
> This way, the code is more consistent between EPF drivers, and pci-epf-test
> does not need to explicitly check if the BAR is reserved, or if the index
> belongs to a BAR succeeding a 64-bit only BAR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
- Mani
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 7dc9704128dc..20c79610712d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -823,8 +823,8 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> size_t pba_size = 0;
> bool msix_capable;
> void *base;
> - int bar, add;
> enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
> + enum pci_barno bar;
> const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
> size_t test_reg_size;
>
> @@ -849,16 +849,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> }
> epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
>
> - for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar += add) {
> - epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> - add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
> + for (bar = BAR_0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) {
> + bar = pci_epc_get_next_free_bar(epc_features, bar);
> + if (bar == NO_BAR)
> + break;
>
> if (bar == test_reg_bar)
> continue;
>
> - if (epc_features->bar[bar].type == BAR_RESERVED)
> - continue;
> -
> base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, bar_size[bar], bar,
> epc_features, PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
> if (!base)
> @@ -871,7 +869,9 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> * either because the BAR can only be a 64-bit BAR, or if
> * we requested a size larger than 4 GB.
> */
> - add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
> + epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> + if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> + bar++;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.44.0
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-13 10:57 [PATCH v3 0/9] PCI: endpoint: set prefetchable bit for 64-bit BARs Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Fix incorrect loop increment Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 10:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] PCI: endpoint: Allocate a 64-bit BAR if that is the only option Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:24 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Remove superfluous code Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_alloc_space() loop Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Simplify pci_epf_test_set_bar() loop Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 11:08 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Clean up pci_epf_test_unbind() Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 11:11 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 10:57 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] PCI: cadence: Set a 64-bit BAR if requested Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:46 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-20 11:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 10:58 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] PCI: rockchip-ep: " Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 5:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-12 17:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-12 21:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 22:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-12 18:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-12 22:02 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-12 22:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-13 10:58 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] PCI: endpoint: Set prefetch when allocating memory for 64-bit BARs Niklas Cassel
2024-03-15 6:44 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-15 17:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-17 11:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-18 3:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-18 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-18 15:13 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-18 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 6:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-18 4:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-18 6:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-03-19 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240315052906.GD3375@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=shradha.t@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).