From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: niklas.cassel@wdc.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
jdmason@kudzu.us, jingoohan1@gmail.com, kw@linux.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: dwc: Fix index 0 incorrectly being interpreted as a free ATU slot
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:41:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240321164123.GA1325373@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304224616.1238966-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 05:46:16PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu()
> {
> ...
> if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
> free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, pci->num_ib_windows);
> else
> free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
> ...
> }
>
> The atu index 0 is valid case for atu number. The find_first_zero_bit()
> will return 6 when second time call into this function if atu is 0. Suppose
> it should use branch 'free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar]'.
>
> Change 'bar_to_atu' to free_win + 1. Initialize bar_to_atu as 0 to indicate
> it have not allocate atu to the bar.
Lorenzo, Krzysztof, Manivannan: any thoughts on this? I don't want to
ask Linus to pull it during the merge window since this hasn't even
been in -next yet. But we could consider it as a fix for v6.9 if it's
urgent.
IMO the commit log does need to say something about what the actual
user-visible problem is. I can't tell what breakage this fixes.
> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/ZXt2A+Fusfz3luQV@x1-carbon/T/#u
> Fixes: 4284c88fff0e ("PCI: designware-ep: Allow pci_epc_set_bar() update inbound map address")
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Change from v1 to v2
> - update subject
> - use free_win + 1 solution
> - still leave MAX_IATU_IN as 256. I am not sure if there are platfrom have
> 256 ATU. Suppose it only use max 6 in current EP framework.
> - @Niklas, can you help test it. My platform become unstable today.
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 5befed2dc02b7..ba932bafdb230 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
> free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, pci->num_ib_windows);
> else
> - free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
> + free_win = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
>
> if (free_win >= pci->num_ib_windows) {
> dev_err(pci->dev, "No free inbound window\n");
> @@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, int type,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win;
> + /*
> + * Always increment free_win before assignment, since value 0 is used to identify
> + * unallocated mapping.
> + */
> + ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win + 1;
> set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -190,7 +194,10 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> enum pci_barno bar = epf_bar->barno;
> - u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar];
> + u32 atu_index = ep->bar_to_atu[bar] - 1;
> +
> + if (!ep->bar_to_atu[bar])
> + return;
>
> __dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, func_no, bar, epf_bar->flags);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-21 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 22:46 [PATCH v2 1/1] PCI: dwc: Fix index 0 incorrectly being interpreted as a free ATU slot Frank Li
2024-03-05 9:05 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-13 11:09 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 8:53 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-20 14:29 ` Frank Li
2024-03-21 8:16 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-21 16:21 ` Frank Li
2024-03-21 16:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-03-21 17:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-21 18:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-03-22 5:26 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-03-22 6:19 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-03-22 19:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-04-02 5:12 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-04-02 9:23 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-04-02 16:05 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240321164123.GA1325373@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox