From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5822F1F945; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712249315; cv=none; b=KyrGtGc8ZT/OFEDWpdJH/tfUOfcj3a7BCuBMpHw8ZlrpYCPc8x7IivjR/5TaLsW7ZOt/JEVpsAVsgLe+O0Ow4WpUf3MlMyLkDZC6uTZsG/yBJCeU4+6JeHiSlN8KWQwQZehsI3sEGulXg9+f5KvIjeR491Dbl6YiCXKMgWG7cME= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712249315; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4+baO60/HkS8UEwh6dSBVKOlPPoYLPD8QXa9JwEp79U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X4sPoBCoposnqivR1gcItX9YpBGOGtfNOg6zNPWkqUwF1XXxcN/vwbo1IS7RIZ37qtFq6JqCNPPCs1EZ/2M4+MggXWZk9/8v2RQCCdkGImeFwq38QC3o8+jetIXRe2JI2I8x55DWE3wgB2YqCQnYnKHsvx1fg6BHSwPD8wswKYg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Qp5jlMUK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Qp5jlMUK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712249314; x=1743785314; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4+baO60/HkS8UEwh6dSBVKOlPPoYLPD8QXa9JwEp79U=; b=Qp5jlMUK0iOxzjD8Q9e8eJ5atyZulISqdhw38BCPv4mMlqnYekqrvQsh aGSXmDq7e9YtrZK7SfAWQVtmv7YYuuX72S9OR5vfl7NogCwH1a7qCRepd pB7VTuM4VuTy07mkMuihm3nQTfHsYRToPPq96aZU7J0+hmx6KGn8RxtM+ fQR/G29NaaRYkDW150APCefIustM1OoFzDbZkXdM3ILHR7QH/X5E6xjbL dWrjHPeBeyI5/9UdaWZOCptyUzE199fNMXFPg2/Dm1BQy4oeDHsVKrdYQ Mtbp4nxNrFYyhQfemd8dehaILySDtP93jIiS23+RHsLbOY8WtDmdB9QWu g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qjiki0FtRjmHpoj/GMWYlQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: F4vEdzfkRmWw69I52rONDQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11034"; a="7671623" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,179,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7671623" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Apr 2024 09:48:04 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: czlhlvDrQJSA4NTlZ8L56A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ai+mWD5GSb6eXXkGMVH61A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,179,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="18891118" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e61807b1d151) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2024 09:48:00 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e61807b1d151 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rsQFq-0001IY-04; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 16:47:58 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 00:47:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jim Quinlan , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Saenz Julienne , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Cyril Brulebois , Phil Elwell , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Florian Fainelli , Jim Quinlan , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] PCI: brcmstb: Set downstream maximum {no-}snoop LTR values Message-ID: <202404050014.hKb6rKUM-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240403213902.26391-4-james.quinlan@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240403213902.26391-4-james.quinlan@broadcom.com> Hi Jim, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on 9f8413c4a66f2fb776d3dc3c9ed20bf435eb305e] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jim-Quinlan/dt-bindings-PCI-brcmstb-Add-property-brcm-clkreq-mode/20240404-054118 base: 9f8413c4a66f2fb776d3dc3c9ed20bf435eb305e patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403213902.26391-4-james.quinlan%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH v9 3/4] PCI: brcmstb: Set downstream maximum {no-}snoop LTR values config: arm64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240405/202404050014.hKb6rKUM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240405/202404050014.hKb6rKUM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404050014.hKb6rKUM-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c:728:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 728 | void brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max +728 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c 727 > 728 void brcm_set_downstream_devs_ltr_max(struct brcm_pcie *pcie) 729 { 730 struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie); 731 u16 ltr_fmt = FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(9, 0), BRCM_LTR_MAX_VALUE) 732 | FIELD_PREP(GENMASK(12, 10), BRCM_LTR_MAX_SCALE) 733 | GENMASK(15, 15); 734 735 if (bridge->native_ltr) 736 pci_walk_bus(bridge->bus, brcm_set_dev_ltr_max, <r_fmt); 737 } 738 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki