From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Manikanta Maddireddy" <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>,
"Shanker Donthineni" <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
"Krishna Thota" <kthota@nvidia.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [Query] ACS enablement in the DT based boot flow
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:28:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240410192840.GA2147526@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH8PR12MB667446D4A4CAD6E0A2F488B5B83F2@PH8PR12MB6674.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[+cc Will, Joerg]
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 10:40:15AM +0000, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Hi folks,
> ACS (Access Control Services) is configured for a PCI device through
> pci_enable_acs(). The first thing pci_enable_acs() checks for is
> whether the global flag 'pci_acs_enable' is set or not. The global
> flag 'pci_acs_enable' is set by the function pci_request_acs().
>
> pci_enable_acs() function is called whenever a new PCI device is
> added to the system
>
> pci_enable_acs+0x4c/0x2a4
> pci_acs_init+0x38/0x60
> pci_device_add+0x1a0/0x670
> pci_scan_single_device+0xc4/0x100
> pci_scan_slot+0x6c/0x1e0
> pci_scan_child_bus_extend+0x48/0x2e0
> pci_scan_root_bus_bridge+0x64/0xf0
> pci_host_probe+0x18/0xd0
>
> In the case of a system that boots using device-tree blob,
> pci_request_acs() is called when the device driver binds with the
> respective device
>
> of_iommu_configure+0xf4/0x230
> of_dma_configure_id+0x110/0x340
> pci_dma_configure+0x54/0x120
> really_probe+0x80/0x3e0
> __driver_probe_device+0x88/0x1c0
> driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x140
> __device_attach_driver+0xe8/0x1e0
> bus_for_each_drv+0x78/0xf0
> __device_attach+0x104/0x1e0
> device_attach+0x14/0x30
> pci_bus_add_device+0x50/0xd0
> pci_bus_add_devices+0x38/0x90
> pci_host_probe+0x40/0xd0
>
> Since the device addition always happens first followed by the
> driver binding, this flow effectively makes sure that ACS never gets
> enabled.
>
> Ideally, I would expect the pci_request_acs() get called (probably
> by the OF framework itself) before calling pci_enable_acs().
>
> This happens in the ACPI flow where pci_request_acs() is called
> during IORT node initialization (i.e. iort_init_platform_devices()
> function).
>
> Is this understanding correct? If yes, would it make sense to call
> pci_request_acs() during OF initialization (similar to IORT
> initialization in ACPI flow)?
Your understanding looks correct to me. My call graph notes, FWIW:
mem_init
pci_iommu_alloc # x86 only
amd_iommu_detect # init_state = IOMMU_START_STATE
iommu_go_to_state(IOMMU_IVRS_DETECTED)
state_next
switch (init_state)
case IOMMU_START_STATE:
detect_ivrs
pci_request_acs
pci_acs_enable = 1 # <--
detect_intel_iommu
pci_request_acs
pci_acs_enable = 1 # <--
pci_scan_single_device # PCI enumeration
...
pci_init_capabilities
pci_acs_init
pci_enable_acs
if (pci_acs_enable) # <--
pci_std_enable_acs
__driver_probe_device
really_probe
pci_dma_configure # pci_bus_type.dma_configure
if (OF)
of_dma_configure
of_dma_configure_id
of_iommu_configure
pci_request_acs # <-- 6bf6c24720d3
iommu_probe_device
else if (ACPI)
acpi_dma_configure
acpi_dma_configure_id
acpi_iommu_configure_id
iommu_probe_device
The pci_request_acs() in of_iommu_configure(), which happens too late
to affect pci_enable_acs(), was added by 6bf6c24720d3 ("iommu/of:
Request ACS from the PCI core when configuring IOMMU linkage"), so I
cc'd Will and Joerg. I don't know if that *used* to work and got
broken somehow, or if it never worked as intended.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-01 10:40 [Query] ACS enablement in the DT based boot flow Vidya Sagar
2024-04-10 7:40 ` Vidya Sagar
2024-04-10 19:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-04-28 7:23 ` Will Deacon
2024-07-18 10:13 ` Pavan Kondeti
2024-11-06 6:13 ` Pavan Kondeti
2024-11-06 15:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240410192840.GA2147526@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox