From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
bhelgaas@google.com, Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>,
Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Revert the cfg_access_lock lockdep mechanism
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:11:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240604171121.GA730808@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6e9t9qt.fsf@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 11:03:54AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
>
> > While the experiment did reveal that there are additional places that
> > are missing the lock during secondary bus reset, one of the places that
> > needs to take cfg_access_lock (pci_bus_lock()) is not prepared for
> > lockdep annotation.
> >
> > Specifically, pci_bus_lock() takes pci_dev_lock() recursively and is
> > currently dependent on the fact that the device_lock() is marked
> > lockdep_set_novalidate_class(&dev->mutex). Otherwise, without that
> > annotation, pci_bus_lock() would need to use something like a new
> > pci_dev_lock_nested() helper, a scheme to track a PCI device's depth in
> > the topology, and a hope that the depth of a PCI tree never exceeds the
> > max value for a lockdep subclass.
> >
> > The alternative to ripping out the lockdep coverage would be to deploy a
> > dynamic lock key for every PCI device. Unfortunately, there is evidence
> > that increasing the number of keys that lockdep needs to track to be
> > per-PCI-device is prohibitively expensive for something like the
> > cfg_access_lock.
> >
> > The main motivation for adding the annotation in the first place was to
> > catch unlocked secondary bus resets, not necessarily catch lock ordering
> > problems between cfg_access_lock and other locks. Solve that narrower
> > problem with follow-on patches, and just due to targeted revert for now.
> >
> > Fixes: 7e89efc6e9e4 ("PCI: Lock upstream bridge for pci_reset_function()")
> > Reported-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Closes: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_134186v1/shard-dg2-1/igt@device_reset@unbind-reset-rebind.html
> > Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
> > Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>
> In our ath11k test box commit 7e89efc6e9e4 was causing random kernel
> crashes. I tested patches 1-3 and did not see anymore crashes so:
>
> Tested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Added to commit logs, thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 1:04 [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: Revert / replace the cfg_access_lock lockdep mechanism Dan Williams
2024-05-31 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Revert " Dan Williams
2024-05-31 18:05 ` Dave Jiang
2024-06-04 8:03 ` Kalle Valo
2024-06-04 17:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-06-06 10:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-05-31 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: Warn on missing cfg_access_lock during secondary bus reset Dan Williams
2024-05-31 18:06 ` Dave Jiang
2024-05-31 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock() Dan Williams
2024-05-31 18:07 ` Dave Jiang
2024-06-28 19:25 ` Keith Busch
2024-05-31 21:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: Revert / replace the cfg_access_lock lockdep mechanism Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-03 19:49 ` Hans de Goede
2024-06-03 20:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240604171121.GA730808@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox