From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
lkp@intel.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:06:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701210656.GA16926@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240630025225.9910-1-zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 02:52:25AM +0000, Zhou Shengqing wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:58:56AM +0000, Zhou Shengqing wrote:
> > > This patch add 1k granularity for intel root port bridge.Intel latest
> > > server CPU support 1K granularity,And there is an BIOS setup item named
> > > "EN1K",but linux doesn't support it. if an IIO has 5 IOU (SPR has 5 IOUs)
> > > all are bifurcated 2x8.In a 2P server system,There are 20 P2P bridges
> > > present.if keep 4K granularity allocation,it need 20*4=80k io space,
> > > exceeding 64k.I test it in a 16*nvidia 4090s system under intel eaglestrem
> > > platform.There are six 4090s that cannot be allocated I/O resources.
> > > So I applied this patch.And I found a similar implementation in quirks.c,
> > > but it only targets the Intel P64H2 platform.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/probe.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > index 5fbabb4e3425..909962795311 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> > > @@ -461,6 +461,9 @@ static void pci_read_bridge_windows(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > > u32 buses;
> > > u16 io;
> > > u32 pmem, tmp;
> > > + u16 ven_id, dev_id;
> > > + u16 en1k = 0;
> > > + struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
> > > struct resource res;
> > >
> > > pci_read_config_dword(bridge, PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, &buses);
> > > @@ -478,6 +481,26 @@ static void pci_read_bridge_windows(struct pci_dev *bridge)
> > > }
> > > if (io) {
> > > bridge->io_window = 1;
> > > + if (pci_is_root_bus(bridge->bus)) {
> > > + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bridge->bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &ven_id);
> > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_DEVICE_ID, &dev_id);
> > > + if (ven_id == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL && dev_id == 0x09a2) {
> > > + /*IIO MISC Control offset 0x1c0*/
> > > + pci_read_config_word(dev, 0x1c0, &en1k);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + /*
> > > + *Intel ICX SPR EMR GNR
> > > + *IIO MISC Control (IIOMISCCTRL_1_5_0_CFG) — Offset 1C0h
> > > + *bit 2:Enable 1K (EN1K)
> > > + *This bit when set, enables 1K granularity for I/O space decode
> > > + *in each of the virtual P2P bridges
> > > + *corresponding to root ports, and DMI ports.
> > > + */
> > > + if (en1k & 0x4)
> > > + bridge->io_window_1k = 1;
> > > + }
> >
> > I still think this is not going to work because I don't want this kind
> > of device-specific clutter in this generic path. The pcibios_*
> > interfaces are history that we'd like to get rid of also, but it would
> > be better than putting it here.
>
> Do you think it should be putted to the pci_bios* interface?
>
> And if there is no suitable place to apply this patch,
> then let's just ignore this issue.
What are the device/function addresses of the IIO and the Root Ports?
They must all be on the root bus, and if the IIO is enumerated first
(i.e., if it has a smaller device/function number), you may be able to
make a quirk that applies to the Root Port vendor/device ID but reads
the config bit from the IIO.
quirk_passive_release(), quirk_vialatency(), quirk_amd_780_apc_msi(),
etc. do similar things.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 2:06 [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for intel cpu root port Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-21 21:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-22 15:06 ` zhoushengqing
2024-06-22 17:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-23 2:26 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-24 8:01 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-26 8:27 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 10:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 11:19 ` [PATCH v2] [PATCH v2] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-26 15:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-27 0:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-06-29 21:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-30 2:52 ` Re: [PATCH] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-01 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-07-02 3:56 ` [PATCH v4] Subject: " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-12 18:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-07-23 8:04 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 2:34 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24 3:38 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 5:39 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-24 6:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-24 7:51 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-25 7:44 ` Zhou Shengqing
2024-07-26 2:27 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-07-02 5:49 ` Re: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Enable io space 1k granularity for Zhou Shengqing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240701210656.GA16926@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhoushengqing@ttyinfo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).