Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>,
	Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: kirin: use dev_err_probe() in probe error paths
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 15:53:58 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240707065358.GA3809216@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240706-pcie-kirin-dev_err_probe-v1-1-56df797fb8ee@gmail.com>

Hello,

[...]
> Use dev_err_probe() in all error paths with that construction.

Thank you for this nice refactoring!  Much appreciated.

[...]
> -	if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> +				     "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");

Something that would be nice to get consistent: adjust all the errors
capitalisation to make everything consistent, as appropriate, so that it's
either all lower-case or title case.  A mix of both often looks a bit
sloppy.

Do you think this would be something you would be willing to clean up in
this series too?  Especially since we are touching this code now.

> -	if (!dev->of_node) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "NULL node\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (!dev->of_node)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "NULL node\n");

Perhaps -ENODEV would be more appropriate here?  Also, the error message is
not the best, as such, I wonder if we could make it better while we are at
it, so to speak.

	Krzysztof

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-07  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-06 15:07 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: kirin: cleanup (dev_err_probe() and scoped loop) Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: kirin: use dev_err_probe() in probe error paths Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 19:47   ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-07-06 20:12     ` Javier Carrasco
2024-07-07  6:53   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2024-07-07 12:19     ` Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: kirin: use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Javier Carrasco

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240707065358.GA3809216@rocinante \
    --to=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox