From: "Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>,
Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: kirin: use dev_err_probe() in probe error paths
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 15:53:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240707065358.GA3809216@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240706-pcie-kirin-dev_err_probe-v1-1-56df797fb8ee@gmail.com>
Hello,
[...]
> Use dev_err_probe() in all error paths with that construction.
Thank you for this nice refactoring! Much appreciated.
[...]
> - if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> + "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");
Something that would be nice to get consistent: adjust all the errors
capitalisation to make everything consistent, as appropriate, so that it's
either all lower-case or title case. A mix of both often looks a bit
sloppy.
Do you think this would be something you would be willing to clean up in
this series too? Especially since we are touching this code now.
> - if (!dev->of_node) {
> - dev_err(dev, "NULL node\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (!dev->of_node)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "NULL node\n");
Perhaps -ENODEV would be more appropriate here? Also, the error message is
not the best, as such, I wonder if we could make it better while we are at
it, so to speak.
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-07 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-06 15:07 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: kirin: cleanup (dev_err_probe() and scoped loop) Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 15:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: kirin: use dev_err_probe() in probe error paths Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 19:47 ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-07-06 20:12 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-07-07 6:53 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński [this message]
2024-07-07 12:19 ` Javier Carrasco
2024-07-06 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: kirin: use for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Javier Carrasco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240707065358.GA3809216@rocinante \
--to=kw@linux.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox