From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Zeng, Oak" <oak.zeng@intel.com>,
"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"Shameer Kolothum" <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] Provide a new two step DMA API mapping API
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 20:29:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711232917.GR14050@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240710062212.GA25895@lst.de>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 08:22:12AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:03:20PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Except for the powerpc bypass IOMMU or not is a global decision,
> > > and the bypass is per I/O. So I'm not sure what else you want there?
> >
> > For P2P we know if the DMA will go through the IOMMU or not based on
> > the PCIe fabric path between the initiator (the one doing the DMA) and
> > the target (the one providing the MMIO memory).
>
> Oh, yes. So effectively you are asking if we can arbitrarily mix
> P2P sources in a single map request. I think the only sane answer
> from the iommu/dma subsystem perspective is: hell no.
Well, today we can mix them and the dma_map_sg will sort it out. With
this new API we can't anymore.
So this little detail needs to be taken care of somehow as well, and I
didn't see it in this RFC.
> For the block layer just having one kind per BIO is fine right now,
> although I could see use cases where people would want to combine
> them. We can probably defer that until it is needed, though.
Do you have an application in mind that would want multi-kind per BIO?
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-11 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 9:09 [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] Provide a new two step DMA API mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/18] dma-mapping: query DMA memory type Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/18] dma-mapping: provide an interface to allocate IOVA Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/18] dma-mapping: check if IOVA can be used Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/18] dma-mapping: implement link range API Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/18] mm/hmm: let users to tag specific PFN with DMA mapped bit Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/18] dma-mapping: provide callbacks to link/unlink HMM PFNs to specific IOVA Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/18] iommu/dma: Provide an interface to allow preallocate IOVA Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/18] iommu/dma: Implement link/unlink ranges callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/18] RDMA/umem: Preallocate and cache IOVA for UMEM ODP Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/18] RDMA/umem: Store ODP access mask information in PFN Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/18] RDMA/core: Separate DMA mapping to caching IOVA and page linkage Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/18] RDMA/umem: Prevent UMEM ODP creation with SWIOTLB Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/18] vfio/mlx5: Explicitly use number of pages instead of allocated length Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/18] vfio/mlx5: Rewrite create mkey flow to allow better code reuse Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/18] vfio/mlx5: Explicitly store page list Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/18] vfio/mlx5: Convert vfio to use DMA link API Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/18] block: export helper to get segment max size Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-02 9:09 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/18] nvme-pci: use new dma API Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-04 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2024-07-04 17:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-05 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-05 18:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-06 6:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/18] Provide a new two step DMA API mapping API Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 10:42 ` Zhu Yanjun
2024-07-03 10:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-03 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 15:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-04 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-04 13:18 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-05 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-08 16:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-09 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-09 18:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-10 6:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-11 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-05 22:53 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-07-06 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-07 9:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-07 12:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-05 6:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-07 9:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-07-08 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-09 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-09 19:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-10 6:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-11 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2024-07-12 4:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-12 12:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-13 5:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240711232917.GR14050@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=oak.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).