From: Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"Johan Hovold" <johan@kernel.org>,
"David Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
"Paul M Stillwell Jr" <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux@endlessos.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 11:24:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240805112456.00007cad@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPpJ_edybLMtrN_gxP2h9Z-BuYH+RG-qRqMqgZM1oSVoW1sP5A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:24:18 +0800
Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org> wrote:
> Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org> 於 2024年7月19日 週五 下午4:04寫道:
> >
> > Currently, when enable link's L1.2 features with
> > __pci_enable_link_state(), it configs the link directly without
> > ensuring related L1.2 parameters, such as T_POWER_ON,
> > Common_Mode_Restore_Time, and LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD have been
> > programmed.
> >
> > This leads the link's L1.2 between PCIe Root Port and child device
> > gets wrong configs when a caller tries to enabled it.
> >
> > Here is a failed example on ASUS B1400CEAE with enabled VMD:
> >
> > 10000:e0:06.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 11th Gen Core Processor
> > PCIe Controller (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) ...
> > Capabilities: [200 v1] L1 PM Substates
> > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1+
> > L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=45us
> > PortTPowerOnTime=50us L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1-
> > ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- T_CommonMode=45us LTR1.2_Threshold=101376ns
> > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=50us
> >
> > 10000:e1:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Blue
> > SN550 NVMe SSD (rev 01) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express]) ...
> > Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
> > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
> > L1_PM_Substates+ PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us
> > PortTPowerOnTime=10us L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1-
> > ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
> > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
> >
> > According to "PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4", before enabling ASPM L1.2 on
> > the PCIe Root Port and the child NVMe, they should be programmed
> > with the same LTR1.2_Threshold value. However, they have different
> > values in this case.
> >
> > Invoke aspm_calc_l12_info() to program the L1.2 parameters properly
> > before enable L1.2 bits of L1 PM Substates Control Register in
> > __pci_enable_link_state().
> >
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394
> > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Prepare the PCIe LTR parameters before enable L1 Substates
> >
> > v3:
> > - Only enable supported features for the L1 Substates part
> >
> > v4:
> > - Focus on fixing L1.2 parameters, instead of re-initializing whole
> > L1SS
> >
> > v5:
> > - Fix typo and commit message
> > - Split introducing aspm_get_l1ss_cap() to "PCI/ASPM: Introduce
> > aspm_get_l1ss_cap()"
> >
> > v6:
> > - Skipped
> >
> > v7:
> > - Pick back and rebase on the new version kernel
> > - Drop the link state flag check. And, always config link state's
> > timing parameters
> >
> > v8:
> > - Because pcie_aspm_get_link() might return the link as NULL, move
> > getting the link's parent and child devices after check the link
> > is not NULL. This avoids NULL memory access.
> >
> > drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > index 5db1044c9895..55ff1d26fcea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> > @@ -1411,9 +1411,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
> > static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int
> > state, bool locked) {
> > struct pcie_link_state *link = pcie_aspm_get_link(pdev);
> > + u32 parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap;
> > + struct pci_dev *parent, *child;
> >
> > if (!link)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + parent = link->pdev;
> > + child = link->downstream;
> > +
> > /*
> > * A driver requested that ASPM be enabled on this device,
> > but
> > * if we don't have permission to manage ASPM (e.g., on ACPI
> > @@ -1428,6 +1434,15 @@ static int __pci_enable_link_state(struct
> > pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool locked) if (!locked)
> > down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> > mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
> > + /*
> > + * Ensure L1.2 parameters: Common_Mode_Restore_Times,
> > T_POWER_ON and
> > + * LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD are programmed properly before enable
> > bits for
> > + * L1.2, per PCIe r6.0, sec 5.5.4.
> > + */
> > + parent_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(parent);
> > + child_l1ss_cap = aspm_get_l1ss_cap(child);
> > + aspm_calc_l12_info(link, parent_l1ss_cap, child_l1ss_cap);
> > +
> > link->aspm_default = pci_calc_aspm_enable_mask(state);
> > pcie_config_aspm_link(link, policy_to_aspm_state(link));
> >
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
>
> Hi Nirmal and Paul,
>
> It will be great to have your review here.
>
> I had tried to "set the threshold value in vmd_pm_enable_quirk()"
> directly as Paul said [1]. However, it still needs to get the PCIe
> link from the PCIe device to set the threshold value.
> And, pci_enable_link_state_locked() gets the link. Then, it will be
> great to calculate and programm L1 sub-states' parameters properly
> before configuring the link's ASPM there.
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240624081108.10143-2-jhp@endlessos.org/T/#mc467498213fe1a6116985c04d714dae378976124
>
> Jian-Hong Pan
Hi Jian-Hong Pan,
I am not an LTR, ASPM expert, but this part looks good to me.
Can you explain why you decided to move pci_enable_link_state_locked()
call down to out_state_change in vmd.c? Will it cause any issue if
pci_find_ext_capability returns 0?
Thanks
-nirmal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-05 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 7:52 [PATCH v8 0/4] PCI: vmd: Enable PCI PM's L1 substates of remapped PCIe Root Port and NVMe Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:55 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] PCI: vmd: Set PCI devices to D0 before enable PCI PM's L1 substates Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:57 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] PCI/ASPM: Add notes about enabling PCI-PM L1SS to pci_enable_link_state(_locked) Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 7:59 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] PCI/ASPM: Introduce aspm_get_l1ss_cap() Jian-Hong Pan
2024-07-19 8:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] PCI/ASPM: Fix L1.2 parameters when enable link state Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-02 8:24 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-05 18:24 ` Nirmal Patel [this message]
2024-08-07 4:23 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-05 20:26 ` David E. Box
2024-08-07 10:05 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-08-07 11:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-07 23:27 ` David E. Box
2024-08-08 9:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-12 8:18 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-02 15:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-03 10:31 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-23 8:41 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-23 13:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-03 15:17 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-09-04 3:56 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-09-20 16:03 ` Nirmal Patel
2024-09-23 10:57 ` Jian-Hong Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240805112456.00007cad@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessos.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).