linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:22:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU2YVpQ=csr-O65L_pcNFWbFMvHK4XO44cbfUfPKwuw6vg@mail.gmail.com>

[+cc Richard, Lucas, maintainers of IMX6 PCI]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:40:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> I have a user that is using an IMX8MM SoC (dwc controller) with a
> miniPCIe card that has a PEX8112 PCI-to-PCIe bridge to a legacy PCI
> device and the device is not getting a valid interrupt.

Does pci-imx6.c support INTx at all?

I see that drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c supports both host
and endpoint modes, but the only mention of "intx" is for an IMX
device in endpoint mode to raise an INTx interrupt.

A few DWC-based drivers look like they support INTx:

  dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain
  ks_pcie_config_intx_irq
  rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain (the dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c one)
  uniphier_pcie_config_intx_irq

but most (including pci-imx6.c) don't have anything that looks like
those.

> The PCI bus looks like this:
> 00.00.0: 16c3:abcd (rev 01)
> 01:00.0: 10b5:8112
> ^^^ PEX8112 x1 Lane PCI bridge
> 02:00.0: 4ddc:1a00
> 02:01.0: 4ddc:1a00
> ^^^ PCI devices
> 
> lspci -vvv -s 02:00.0:
> 02:00.0 Communication controller: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00 (rev 10)
>         Subsystem: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00
>         Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium
> >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
>         Region 0: Memory at 18100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=256K]
>         Region 1: Memory at 18180000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=4K]
> ^^^ 'Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0' is wrong
> 
> I found an old thread from 2019 on an NVidia forum [1] where the same
> thing occurred and Nvidia's solution was a patch to the dwc driver to
> call pci_fixup_irqs():
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index ec2e4a61aa4e..a72ba177a5fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>         if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>                 pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
> 
> +       pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> +
>         pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
>         pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> 
> Since that time the pci/dwc drivers have changed quite a bit;
> pci_fixup_irqs() was changed to pci_assign_irq() called now from
> pcie_device_probe() and dw_pcie_host_init() calls commit init
> functions.
> 
> While I don't have the particular card in hand described above yet to
> test with, I did manage to reproduce this on an imx6dl soc (same dwc
> controller and driver) connected to a TI XIO2001 with an Intel I210
> behind it and see the exact same issue.
> 
> Does anyone understand why legacy PCI interrupt mapping behind a
> bridge isn't working here?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tim
> [1] https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/xavier-not-routing-pci-interrupts-across-pex8112-bridge/78556

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-28 21:40 legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller Tim Harvey
2024-08-29 21:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-08-29 21:43   ` Frank Li
2024-08-29 22:00     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-29 22:21       ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:52         ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:11           ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:49       ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:06         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-30 16:15         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-30  1:50   ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-08-30 16:03     ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 16:14       ` Frank Li
2024-09-06 19:37         ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-06 19:58           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-10 16:50             ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-10 23:04               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-12 23:28                 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-23 17:56                   ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-26 22:30                     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).