From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:22:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU2YVpQ=csr-O65L_pcNFWbFMvHK4XO44cbfUfPKwuw6vg@mail.gmail.com>
[+cc Richard, Lucas, maintainers of IMX6 PCI]
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 02:40:33PM -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have a user that is using an IMX8MM SoC (dwc controller) with a
> miniPCIe card that has a PEX8112 PCI-to-PCIe bridge to a legacy PCI
> device and the device is not getting a valid interrupt.
Does pci-imx6.c support INTx at all?
I see that drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c supports both host
and endpoint modes, but the only mention of "intx" is for an IMX
device in endpoint mode to raise an INTx interrupt.
A few DWC-based drivers look like they support INTx:
dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain
ks_pcie_config_intx_irq
rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain (the dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c one)
uniphier_pcie_config_intx_irq
but most (including pci-imx6.c) don't have anything that looks like
those.
> The PCI bus looks like this:
> 00.00.0: 16c3:abcd (rev 01)
> 01:00.0: 10b5:8112
> ^^^ PEX8112 x1 Lane PCI bridge
> 02:00.0: 4ddc:1a00
> 02:01.0: 4ddc:1a00
> ^^^ PCI devices
>
> lspci -vvv -s 02:00.0:
> 02:00.0 Communication controller: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00 (rev 10)
> Subsystem: ILC Data Device Corp Device 1a00
> Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
> Status: Cap- 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium
> >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
> Region 0: Memory at 18100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=256K]
> Region 1: Memory at 18180000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [disabled] [size=4K]
> ^^^ 'Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0' is wrong
>
> I found an old thread from 2019 on an NVidia forum [1] where the same
> thing occurred and Nvidia's solution was a patch to the dwc driver to
> call pci_fixup_irqs():
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> index ec2e4a61aa4e..a72ba177a5fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
> pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>
> + pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
> +
> pci_bus_size_bridges(bus);
> pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
>
> Since that time the pci/dwc drivers have changed quite a bit;
> pci_fixup_irqs() was changed to pci_assign_irq() called now from
> pcie_device_probe() and dw_pcie_host_init() calls commit init
> functions.
>
> While I don't have the particular card in hand described above yet to
> test with, I did manage to reproduce this on an imx6dl soc (same dwc
> controller and driver) connected to a TI XIO2001 with an Intel I210
> behind it and see the exact same issue.
>
> Does anyone understand why legacy PCI interrupt mapping behind a
> bridge isn't working here?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tim
> [1] https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/xavier-not-routing-pci-interrupts-across-pex8112-bridge/78556
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-28 21:40 legacy PCI device behind a bridge not getting a valid IRQ on imx host controller Tim Harvey
2024-08-29 21:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-08-29 21:43 ` Frank Li
2024-08-29 22:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-29 22:21 ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:52 ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:11 ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 15:49 ` Frank Li
2024-08-30 16:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-30 16:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-30 1:50 ` Hongxing Zhu
2024-08-30 16:03 ` Tim Harvey
2024-08-30 16:14 ` Frank Li
2024-09-06 19:37 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-06 19:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-10 16:50 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-10 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-12 23:28 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-23 17:56 ` Tim Harvey
2024-09-26 22:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240829212235.GA68646@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).