public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
Cc: <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>, <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
	<lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <kw@linux.com>,
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>,
	<sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
	<maz@kernel.org>, <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: kirin: Tidy up _probe() related function with dev_err_probe()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:00:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830130031.00003d08@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830035819.13718-3-zhangzekun11@huawei.com>

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:58:15 +0800
Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com> wrote:

> The combination of dev_err() and the returned error code could be
> replaced by dev_err_probe() in driver's probe function. Let's,
> converting to dev_err_probe() to make code more simple.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>
There are a few unnecessarily long lines in here. I'd wrap them.
Otherwise LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 36 +++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> index e9bda1746ca5..fc0a71575085 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> @@ -216,10 +216,8 @@ static int hi3660_pcie_phy_start(struct hi3660_pcie_phy *phy)
>  
>  	usleep_range(PIPE_CLK_WAIT_MIN, PIPE_CLK_WAIT_MAX);
>  	reg_val = kirin_apb_phy_readl(phy, PCIE_APB_PHY_STATUS0);
> -	if (reg_val & PIPE_CLK_STABLE) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "PIPE clk is not stable\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (reg_val & PIPE_CLK_STABLE)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "PIPE clk is not stable\n");
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -371,10 +369,8 @@ static int kirin_pcie_get_gpio_enable(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	if (ret > MAX_PCI_SLOTS)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Too many GPIO clock requests!\n");
>  
>  	pcie->n_gpio_clkreq = ret;
>  
> @@ -421,16 +417,12 @@ static int kirin_pcie_parse_port(struct kirin_pcie *pcie,
>  			}
>  
>  			pcie->num_slots++;
> -			if (pcie->num_slots > MAX_PCI_SLOTS) {
> -				dev_err(dev, "Too many PCI slots!\n");
> -				return -EINVAL;
> -			}
> +			if (pcie->num_slots > MAX_PCI_SLOTS)
> +				return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Too many PCI slots!\n");

Lines are getting a bit long, I'd wrap after -EINVAL,
Same in other cases.


>  
>  			ret = of_pci_get_devfn(child);
> -			if (ret < 0) {
> -				dev_err(dev, "failed to parse devfn: %d\n", ret);
> -				return ret;
> -			}
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse devfn\n");
>  
>  			slot = PCI_SLOT(ret);
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-30 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-30  3:58 [PATCH v2 0/6] Simplify code with _scoped() helper functions Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] PCI: kirin: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: kirin: Tidy up _probe() related function with dev_err_probe() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30 12:00   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] PCI: mediatek: Use helper function for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] PCI: mt7621: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30  4:35   ` Sergio Paracuellos
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] PCI: apple: Use helper function for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30  3:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] PCI: tegra: " Zhang Zekun
2024-08-30 12:03   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240830130031.00003d08@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
    --cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangzekun11@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox