From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, corbet@lwn.net, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, gospo@broadcom.com,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com,
somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com,
manoj.panicker2@amd.com, Eric.VanTassell@amd.com,
vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, horms@kernel.org,
bagasdotme@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, lukas@wunner.de,
paul.e.luse@intel.com, jing2.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 02/12] PCI: Add TPH related register definition
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:52:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240904195254.GA344807@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822204120.3634-3-wei.huang2@amd.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 03:41:10PM -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
> Linux has some basic, but incomplete, definition for the TPH Requester
> capability registers. Also the definitions of TPH Requester control
> register and TPH Completer capability, as well as the ST fields of
> MSI-X entry, are missing. Add all required definitions to support TPH
> without changing the existing Linux UAPI.
> /* TPH Requester */
> #define PCI_TPH_CAP 4 /* capability register */
> -#define PCI_TPH_CAP_LOC_MASK 0x600 /* location mask */
> -#define PCI_TPH_LOC_NONE 0x000 /* no location */
> -#define PCI_TPH_LOC_CAP 0x200 /* in capability */
> -#define PCI_TPH_LOC_MSIX 0x400 /* in MSI-X */
> -#define PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_MASK 0x07FF0000 /* ST table mask */
> -#define PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_SHIFT 16 /* ST table shift */
> -#define PCI_TPH_BASE_SIZEOF 0xc /* size with no ST table */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_NO_ST 0x00000001 /* No ST Mode Supported */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_INT_VEC 0x00000002 /* Interrupt Vector Mode Supported */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_DEV_SPEC 0x00000004 /* Device Specific Mode Supported */
I think these modes should all include "ST" to clearly delineate
Steering Tags from the Processing Hints. E.g.,
PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_NO_ST or maybe PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_NONE
PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_INT_VEC
PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_DEV_SPEC
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_EXT_TPH 0x00000100 /* Ext TPH Requester Supported */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_LOC_MASK 0x00000600 /* ST Table Location */
> +#define PCI_TPH_LOC_NONE 0x00000000 /* Not present */
> +#define PCI_TPH_LOC_CAP 0x00000200 /* In capability */
> +#define PCI_TPH_LOC_MSIX 0x00000400 /* In MSI-X */
These are existing symbols just being tidied, so can't really add "ST"
here unless we just add aliases. Since they're just used internally,
not by drivers, I think they're fine as-is.
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_MASK 0x07FF0000 /* ST Table Size */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CAP_ST_SHIFT 16 /* ST Table Size shift */
> +#define PCI_TPH_BASE_SIZEOF 0xc /* Size with no ST table */
> +
> +#define PCI_TPH_CTRL 8 /* control register */
> +#define PCI_TPH_CTRL_MODE_SEL_MASK 0x00000007 /* ST Mode Select */
> +#define PCI_TPH_NO_ST_MODE 0x0 /* No ST Mode */
> +#define PCI_TPH_INT_VEC_MODE 0x1 /* Interrupt Vector Mode */
> +#define PCI_TPH_DEV_SPEC_MODE 0x2 /* Device Specific Mode */
These are also internal, but they're new and I think they should also
include "ST" to match the CAP #defines.
Even better, maybe we only add these and use them for both CAP and
CTRL since they're defined with identical values.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 20:41 [PATCH V4 00/12] PCIe TPH and cache direct injection support Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 01/12] PCI: Introduce PCIe TPH support framework Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 02/12] PCI: Add TPH related register definition Wei Huang
2024-09-04 19:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-09-05 15:08 ` Wei Huang
2024-09-05 16:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-16 21:08 ` Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 03/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_modes() to query TPH modes Wei Huang
2024-09-04 19:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-05 14:46 ` Wei Huang
2024-09-05 15:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 04/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_enable_tph() to enable TPH Wei Huang
2024-09-13 11:35 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 05/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_disable_tph() to disable TPH Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 06/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_enabled() to check TPH state Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 07/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_set_st_entry() to set ST tag Wei Huang
2024-08-26 11:46 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 08/12] PCI/TPH: Add pcie_tph_get_cpu_st() to get " Wei Huang
2024-09-14 10:10 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-09-16 18:58 ` Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 09/12] PCI/TPH: Add save/restore support for TPH Wei Huang
2024-09-04 20:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 10/12] PCI/TPH: Add pci=nostmode to force TPH No ST Mode Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 11/12] bnxt_en: Add TPH support in BNXT driver Wei Huang
2024-08-26 20:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-26 20:56 ` Andy Gospodarek
2024-08-26 22:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-27 14:50 ` Andy Gospodarek
2024-08-27 19:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-27 19:20 ` Michael Chan
2024-09-05 15:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-11 15:37 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-09-16 18:55 ` Wei Huang
2024-09-18 17:31 ` Alejandro Lucero Palau
2024-09-19 16:14 ` Wei Huang
2024-08-22 20:41 ` [PATCH V4 12/12] bnxt_en: Pass NQ ID to the FW when allocating RX/RX AGG rings Wei Huang
2024-09-03 22:42 ` [PATCH V4 00/12] PCIe TPH and cache direct injection support Wei Huang
2024-09-04 18:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-04 19:48 ` Wei Huang
2024-09-04 20:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-04 20:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-05 15:45 ` Wei Huang
2024-09-05 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240904195254.GA344807@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=Eric.VanTassell@amd.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=manoj.panicker2@amd.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.e.luse@intel.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).