From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7120178CDE; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 14:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725891082; cv=none; b=l0PmKnwg+EC3T5XOdapAWsLYYeuc6MnzZI9AZ1DMUd9QMFy3Tp2MzFY7y/w/h0FhIAhvJRvdrpNGQVh2KCjta217Ozwga4LPLeuit4rtfhxRVTxJNO/GnBsO0rOifpIyKQwb52Hz4238BxXN9Fa0iCqpMTUhlWzJKPO4N7SMhSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725891082; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KQERd0/HW0azgOfhyuune9R/Lp8/VYQZFm6Fc3RiqyY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VTpM4Um5h7+QPJGM1IqK4AIbKaJyR4nLqVJFChrmwUNWLzQcYbgNlKBlcUXygbw/wie5njtLjwUKMzJLK9Zi5yboLMeu+SXx7fyBiWjleg6qY5Ij2Tk787kVz3DDrsZdxfBtYw9MdqynkK8PGX1M5uJcVJL+uXhHGgD6AiHE1t4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d8b679d7f2so3437531a91.1; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725891080; x=1726495880; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5PE9JmQQYOyPtJIHrjl9PS2qZKnpQmCLvdsLa/Qttxs=; b=Bpw4q5p68h+dCjOx5VWr1AvhXDEuJpoGT9CvT/nINM60zKw2HThtvb4UN49LshpcxT dNOxiWBk755a41nlaBasFMGGIrJW7SOAID+kMPLOtOwgFGPfylk+kYocyiNUkIcMZ+Nc eKXeB64w6NpJJhfLV7ORU4pOIQhJHJEJplnR/k/Fw0LlQnDUwt9j8mmHRMIRVq3Wy5WL IoZPwxMG1RyUvKVKtqkXa96Co6Rjjm3KEx8725guDxT5VmaOI4MUqNvzxUKlzI/1JSpm OoVROXMsf+L3U5kqVfiMdhzCEqh6/RZ9fx40RAFVA/DbYskq9lIhiZFkSTkQFNWpQFtg OmAg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVK+SMxE6f9XPqJ1kX1Chgp/Mg5bXvKEXcRrcquFJ9jRj+bcsJvkVVmohMv4xZs9/gZQd5ZBoKovbAE@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCVO3rQ/cXVZnwx8KLgv0XlsSx52p4c54EMmIiZIk2WP4S2GwaROTXaxfoQps7lQ9urbX53TpGScvQxu40Y=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyOYoz1HDJB02tSye4CmAUdGFgXEyE71A9AB+8jJdM+qwoRCov6 NW0gjqpASl/NiJO2wCDg3dCP6f9CEvK/7UKt3YMDlc/3E04wbsLD X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGE2Vfy6top088oA1Few5Dd9p5vIxVFXKV6EhhKEYq+K6sABKcFckGkYa68sfsqolhHGPV0Sw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bc97:b0:2d8:7edb:fd2 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2dad501f815mr14424336a91.22.1725891079882; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fpd11144dd.ap.nuro.jp. [209.17.68.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2db0419aab4sm4636565a91.15.2024.09.09.07.11.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Sep 2024 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:11:15 +0900 From: Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= To: Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Matthew W Carlis , Mika Westerberg , Oliver O'Halloran , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI: Revert to the original speed after PCIe failed link retraining Message-ID: <20240909141115.GA2663203@rocinante> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello, > You still seem to have the old version of this patch in enumeration > branch. > > Could you please consider replacing it with this v3 one that is slightly > better (use_lt was changed to true because it makes more sense). Done. Should be up to date now. Krzysztof