linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kaihengfeng@gmail.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:57:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912165709.GA674430@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAd53p7vP8TcPj=u5TTuPMXFaWW15hwpJdECCprvXGBhigKD6Q@mail.gmail.com>

[+cc Rafael]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:00:43AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 3:05 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:24:11PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> > > Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
> > > connected.
> > >
> > > The following error message can be found during shutdown:
> > > pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received from 0000:09:04.0
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable, type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0:   device [8086:0b26] error status/mask=00000080/00002000
> > > pcieport 0000:09:04.0:    [ 7] BadDLLP
> > >
> > > Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
> > > however the spurious wakeup still happens.
> > >
> > > The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
> > > putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
> > >
> > > I don't have a sniffer so this is purely guesswork, however I believe
> > > putting device to low power state it's the right thing to do.
> >
> > My objection here is that we don't have an explanation of why this
> > should matter or a pointer to any spec language about this situation,
> > so it feels a little bit random.
> 
> I have the same feeling too. The PCIe spec doesn't specify what's the
> correct power state for shutdown.
> So we can only "logically" think the software should put devices to
> low power state during shutdown.
> 
> > I suppose the problem wouldn't happen if AER interrupts were disabled?
> > We already do disable them in aer_suspend(), but maybe that's not used
> > in the shutdown path?
> 
> That was my first thought, so I modified pcie_port_shutdown_service()
> to disable AER interrupt.
> That approach didn't work though.
> 
> > My understanding is that .shutdown() should turn off device interrupts
> > and stop DMA.  So maybe we need an aer_shutdown() that disables
> > interrupts?
> 
> Logically we should do that. However that approach doesn't solve this issue.

I'm not completely clear on the semantics of the .shutdown()
interface.  The doc at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/device/driver.h?id=v6.10#n73
says "@shutdown: Called at shut-down time to quiesce the device"

Turning off device interrupts and DMA *would* fit within the idea of
quiescing the device.  Does that also include changing the device
power state?  I dunno.  The power state isn't *mentioned* in the
.shutdown() context, while it *is* mentioned for .suspend().

IIUC, this patch and commit log uses "shutdown" to refer to a
system-wide *poweroff*, which is a different concept despite using the
same "shutdown" name.

So should the system poweroff procedure use .suspend()?  Should it use
both .shutdown() and .suspend()?  I think it only uses .shutdown()
today:

  kernel_power_off
    kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
      device_shutdown
        while (!list_empty(&devices_kset->list))
          dev->bus->shutdown(dev)
            pci_device_shutdown

There are several driver .shutdown() methods that do things like this:

  e1000_shutdown
    if (system_state == SYSTEM_POWER_OFF)
      pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot)

Maybe that's the right thing and should be done by the PCI core, which
is similar to what you propose here.  But I think it muddies the
definition of .shutdown() a bit by mixing in power management stuff.

> > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
> > > Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > index af2996d0d17f..4c6f66f3eb54 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > >       if (drv && drv->shutdown)
> > >               drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
> > >
> > > +     /*
> > > +      * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
> > > +      * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used. Hence keep it
> > > +      * as is.
> > > +      */
> > > +     if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
> > > +             pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
> > > +
> > >       /*
> > >        * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
> > >        * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-12 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-12  6:24 [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown Kai-Heng Feng
2024-07-12 14:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-22 19:28 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-26 12:03   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-11 14:08   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-11 19:16   ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:38     ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-12  7:02       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 13:10         ` Mario Limonciello
2024-10-04  4:33       ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2024-10-04  9:26         ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12  3:00   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 16:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-09-13  6:00       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-13  8:01         ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13 20:33           ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-15  7:14             ` Mika Westerberg
2024-10-09 22:24           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-10  4:52             ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240912165709.GA674430@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=kaihengfeng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).