From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks() function signature
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 11:50:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012062033.2w7jbfiptvdlklzl@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012050611.1908-4-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:36:05AM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> Refactor the rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks function to accept a
> struct rockchip_pcie pointer instead of a void pointer. This change
> improves type safety and code readability by explicitly specifying
> the expected data type.
>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
> v7: None
> v6: Fix the subject, add the missing () in the function name.
Did you remove it in v7? Please don't do that, it just increases the burden on
reviewers.
- Mani
> v5: Fix the commit message and add r-b Manivannan.
> v4: None
> v3: None
> v2: No
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 3 +--
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 9a118e2b8cbd..c3147111f1a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -269,9 +269,8 @@ int rockchip_pcie_enable_clocks(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rockchip_pcie_enable_clocks);
>
> -void rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(void *data)
> +void rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> {
> - struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = data;
>
> clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->num_clks, rockchip->clks);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 2761699f670b..7f0f938e9195 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip);
> int rockchip_pcie_get_phys(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip);
> void rockchip_pcie_deinit_phys(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip);
> int rockchip_pcie_enable_clocks(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip);
> -void rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(void *data);
> +void rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip);
> void rockchip_pcie_cfg_configuration_accesses(
> struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u32 type);
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 5:06 [PATCH v7 0/3] PCIe RK3399 clock and reset using new helper functions Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify clock handling by using clk_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:08 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 8:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 10:04 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 12:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 14:06 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 5:06 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks() function signature Anand Moon
2024-10-12 6:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-10-12 7:25 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 8:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-12 10:04 ` Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012062033.2w7jbfiptvdlklzl@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox