public inbox for linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@quicinc.com>,
	kevin.xie@starfivetech.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quic_krichai@quicinc.com,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: starfive: Enable PCIe controller's runtime PM before probing host bridge
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:08:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241014180841.GA613986@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014174817.i4yrjozmfbdrm3md@thinkpad>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 11:18:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 12:23:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:26:07AM -0700, Mayank Rana wrote:
> > > PCIe controller device (i.e. PCIe starfive device) is parent to PCIe host
> > > bridge device. To enable runtime PM of PCIe host bridge device (child
> > > device), it is must to enable parent device's runtime PM to avoid seeing
> > > the below warning from PM core:
> > > 
> > > pcie-starfive 940000000.pcie: Enabling runtime PM for inactive device
> > > with active children
> > > 
> > > Fix this issue by enabling starfive pcie controller device's runtime PM
> > > before calling pci_host_probe() in plda_pcie_host_init().
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@quicinc.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > 
> > I want this in the same series as Krishna's patch to turn on runtime
> > PM of host bridges.  That's how I know they need to be applied in
> > order.  If they're not in the same series, they're likely to be
> > applied out of order.
> 
> There is no harm in applying this patch on its own. It fixes a legit
> issue of enabling the parent runtime PM before the child as required
> by the PM core. Rest of the controller drivers follow the same
> pattern.
> 
> I fail to understand why you want this to be combined with Krishna's
> patch. That patch is only a trigger, but even without that patch the
> issue still exists (not user visible ofc).

I don't want it *combined* with Krishna's patch.

I want this applied *before* Krishna's patch because if we apply
Krishna's patch first, we have some interval where we report the
"Enabling runtime PM for inactive device with active children" error.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-14 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-14 16:26 [PATCH v3] PCI: starfive: Enable PCIe controller's runtime PM before probing host bridge Mayank Rana
2024-10-14 17:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-14 17:40   ` Mayank Rana
2024-10-14 17:48   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-14 18:08     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-10-15  4:39       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-16 20:24         ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241014180841.GA613986@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kevin.xie@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_mrana@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox