Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Improve pci_epc_ops::align_addr() interface
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:07:12 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241015090712.112674-1-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)

The PCI endpoint controller operation interface for the align_addr()
operation uses the phys_addr_t type for the PCI address argument and
return a value using this type. This is not ideal as PCI addresses are
bus addresses, not regular memory physical addresses. Replace the use of
phys_addr_t for this operation with the generic u64 type. To be
consistent with this change the Designware driver implementation of this
operation (function dw_pcie_ep_align_addr()) as well as the type of PCI
address fields of struct pci_epc_map are also changed.

Fixes: e98c99e2ccad ("PCI: endpoint: Introduce pci_epc_mem_map()/unmap()")
Fixes: cb6b7158fdf5 ("PCI: dwc: endpoint: Implement the pci_epc_ops::align_addr() operation")
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
---
Changes from v1:
 - Also updated the type of the pci_addr and map_pci_addr fields of
   struct pci_epc_map.

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 6 +++---
 include/linux/pci-epc.h                         | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
index 0ada60487c25..df1460ed63d9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -268,12 +268,12 @@ static int dw_pcie_find_index(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, phys_addr_t addr,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t dw_pcie_ep_align_addr(struct pci_epc *epc,
-			phys_addr_t pci_addr, size_t *pci_size, size_t *offset)
+static u64 dw_pcie_ep_align_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, u64 pci_addr,
+				 size_t *pci_size, size_t *offset)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
-	phys_addr_t mask = pci->region_align - 1;
+	u64 mask = pci->region_align - 1;
 	size_t ofst = pci_addr & mask;
 
 	*pci_size = ALIGN(ofst + *pci_size, ep->page_size);
diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epc.h b/include/linux/pci-epc.h
index f4b8dc37e447..de8cc3658220 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci-epc.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci-epc.h
@@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ pci_epc_interface_string(enum pci_epc_interface_type type)
  * @virt_addr: virtual address at which @pci_addr is mapped
  */
 struct pci_epc_map {
-	phys_addr_t	pci_addr;
+	u64		pci_addr;
 	size_t		pci_size;
 
-	phys_addr_t	map_pci_addr;
+	u64		map_pci_addr;
 	size_t		map_size;
 
 	phys_addr_t	phys_base;
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ struct pci_epc_ops {
 			   struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar);
 	void	(*clear_bar)(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
 			     struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar);
-	phys_addr_t (*align_addr)(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t pci_addr,
-				  size_t *size, size_t *offset);
+	u64	(*align_addr)(struct pci_epc *epc, u64 pci_addr, size_t *size,
+			      size_t *offset);
 	int	(*map_addr)(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
 			    phys_addr_t addr, u64 pci_addr, size_t size);
 	void	(*unmap_addr)(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
-- 
2.47.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15  9:07 Damien Le Moal [this message]
2024-10-15  9:20 ` [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Improve pci_epc_ops::align_addr() interface Niklas Cassel
2024-10-16 16:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-16 16:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-17  0:37   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17  0:46     ` Damien Le Moal
2024-11-02 11:09       ` Krzysztof Wilczyński

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241015090712.112674-1-dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox