From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:58:29 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241017052829.umil6en3rwsz7dvr@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANAwSgRnd5jaZjoNtCLcq6nRGz3gC-VwjhxsiG7haiowrmZs_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:17:35AM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Manivannan,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 23:53, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 05:19:07PM +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> > > Currently, the driver acquires and asserts/deasserts the resets
> > > individually thereby making the driver complex to read. But this
> > > can be simplified by using the reset_control_bulk APIs.
> > > Use devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive() API to acquire all
> > > the resets and use reset_control_bulk_{assert/deassert}() APIs to
> > > assert/deassert them in bulk.
> > >
> > > Following the recommendations in 'Rockchip RK3399 TRM v1.3 Part2':
> > >
> > > 1. Split the reset controls into two groups as per section '17.5.8.1.1 PCIe
> > > as Root Complex'.
> > >
> > > 2. Deassert the 'Pipe, MGMT Sticky, MGMT, Core' resets in groups as per
> > > section '17.5.8.1.1 PCIe as Root Complex'. This is accomplished using the
> > > reset_control_bulk APIs.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > v9: Improved the commit message and try to fix few review comments.
> >
> > You haven't fixed all of them... Please take a look at all of my comments.
>
> It is becoming a nightmare for me, my confidence is a the lowest.
Me too. It makes me go crazy if the trivial comments are not addressed in
multiple revisions and it results in waste of time for both of us.
> Can you fix this while applying or I will resend it with the fix?
I don't merge the dwc patches, so I cannot do that. But what's preventing you
from addressing those comments. You cannot put the burden on the maintainers for
your mistake, sorry.
- Mani
> >
> > - Mani
> >
> Thanks
> -Anand
>
> > > v8: I tried to address reviews and comments from Mani.
> > > Follow the sequence of De-assert as per the driver code.
> > > Drop the comment in the driver.
> > > Improve the commit message with the description of the TMP section.
> > > Improve the reason for the core functional changes in the commit
> > > description.
> > > Improve the error handling messages of the code.
> > > v7: replace devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive()
> > > with devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive()
> > > update the functional changes.
> > > V6: Add reason for the split of the RESET pins.
> > > v5: Fix the De-assert reset core as per the TRM
> > > De-assert the PIPE_RESET_N/MGMT_STICKY_RESET_N/MGMT_RESET_N/RESET_N
> > > simultaneously.
> > > v4: use dev_err_probe in error path.
> > > v3: Fix typo in commit message, dropped reported by.
> > > v2: Fix compilation error reported by Intel test robot
> > > fixed checkpatch warning.
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 154 +++++--------------------
> > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 26 +++--
> > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> > > index 2777ef0cb599..adf11208cc82 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > > struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > > struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> > > struct resource *regs;
> > > - int err;
> > > + int err, i;
> > >
> > > if (rockchip->is_rc) {
> > > regs = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> > > @@ -69,55 +69,23 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > > if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
> > > rockchip->link_gen = 2;
> > >
> > > - rockchip->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "core");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->core_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->core_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing core reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->core_rst);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - rockchip->mgmt_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "mgmt");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing mgmt reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_rst);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
> > > - "mgmt-sticky");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing mgmt-sticky reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst);
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - rockchip->pipe_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pipe");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pipe_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->pipe_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing pipe reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->pipe_rst);
> > > - }
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS; i++)
> > > + rockchip->pm_rsts[i].id = rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[i];
> > >
> > > - rockchip->pm_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pm");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pm_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->pm_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing pm reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->pm_rst);
> > > - }
> > > + err = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(dev,
> > > + ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->pm_rsts);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Cannot get the PM reset\n");
> > >
> > > - rockchip->pclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pclk");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->pclk_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->pclk_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing pclk reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->pclk_rst);
> > > - }
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS; i++)
> > > + rockchip->core_rsts[i].id = rockchip_pci_core_rsts[i];
> > >
> > > - rockchip->aclk_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "aclk");
> > > - if (IS_ERR(rockchip->aclk_rst)) {
> > > - if (PTR_ERR(rockchip->aclk_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > - dev_err(dev, "missing aclk reset property in node\n");
> > > - return PTR_ERR(rockchip->aclk_rst);
> > > - }
> > > + err = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(dev,
> > > + ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->core_rsts);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Cannot get the CORE resets\n");
> > >
> > > if (rockchip->is_rc) {
> > > rockchip->ep_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "ep",
> > > @@ -147,23 +115,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > > int err, i;
> > > u32 regs;
> > >
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->aclk_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert aclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - return err;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->pclk_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert pclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - return err;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->pm_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert pm_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - return err;
> > > - }
> > > + err = reset_control_bulk_assert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->pm_rsts);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Couldn't assert PM resets\n");
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < MAX_LANE_NUM; i++) {
> > > err = phy_init(rockchip->phys[i]);
> > > @@ -173,47 +128,17 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->core_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert core_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->mgmt_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert mgmt_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert mgmt_sticky_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_assert(rockchip->pipe_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "assert pipe_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > + err = reset_control_bulk_assert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->core_rsts);
> > > + if (err)
> > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Couldn't assert Core resets\n");
> > >
> > > udelay(10);
> > >
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pm_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert pm_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->aclk_rst);
> > > + err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->pm_rsts);
> > > if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert aclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_exit_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pclk_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert pclk_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't deassert PM resets %d\n", err);
> > > goto err_exit_phy;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -252,31 +177,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > > goto err_power_off_phy;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * Please don't reorder the deassert sequence of the following
> > > - * four reset pins.
> > > - */
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert mgmt_sticky_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_power_off_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->core_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert core_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_power_off_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->mgmt_rst);
> > > - if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert mgmt_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > - goto err_power_off_phy;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - err = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->pipe_rst);
> > > + err = reset_control_bulk_deassert(ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS,
> > > + rockchip->core_rsts);
> > > if (err) {
> > > - dev_err(dev, "deassert pipe_rst err %d\n", err);
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't deassert CORE %d\n", err);
> ok, it shipped my review process.
> > > goto err_power_off_phy;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > > index bebab80c9553..cc667c73d42f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
> > > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * The upper 16 bits of PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG are a write mask for the lower 16
> > > @@ -288,18 +289,29 @@
> > > (((c) << ((b) * 8 + 5)) & \
> > > ROCKCHIP_PCIE_CORE_EP_FUNC_BAR_CFG_BAR_CTRL_MASK(b))
> > >
> > > +#define ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_pci_pm_rsts)
> > > +#define ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_pci_core_rsts)
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[] = {
> > > + "pm",
> > > + "pclk",
> > > + "aclk",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const char * const rockchip_pci_core_rsts[] = {
> > > + "mgmt-sticky",
> > > + "core",
> > > + "mgmt",
> > > + "pipe",
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct rockchip_pcie {
> > > void __iomem *reg_base; /* DT axi-base */
> > > void __iomem *apb_base; /* DT apb-base */
> > > bool legacy_phy;
> > > struct phy *phys[MAX_LANE_NUM];
> > > - struct reset_control *core_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *mgmt_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *mgmt_sticky_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *pipe_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *pm_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *aclk_rst;
> > > - struct reset_control *pclk_rst;
> > > + struct reset_control_bulk_data pm_rsts[ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS];
> > > + struct reset_control_bulk_data core_rsts[ROCKCHIP_NUM_CORE_RSTS];
> > > struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> > > int num_clks;
> > > struct regulator *vpcie12v; /* 12V power supply */
> > > --
> > > 2.44.0
> > >
> >
> > --
> > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 5:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 11:49 [PATCH v9 0/3] PCIe RK3399 clock and reset using new helper functions Anand Moon
2024-10-16 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify clock handling by using clk_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-16 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function Anand Moon
2024-10-16 18:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-10-17 3:47 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-17 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-10-17 6:03 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-16 11:49 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] PCI: rockchip: Refactor rockchip_pcie_disable_clocks() function signature Anand Moon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241017052829.umil6en3rwsz7dvr@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox