From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71450179A3 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:04:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729407866; cv=none; b=tnFHNcqb/oMiHnKeu3M6Jh42tMMEbxL02+5eS8YT19mlOARGf/Qy+2wIPvFBtbfXFlDwsMt3s3f3CHWBmJKltcA6pOjl3orpJpRo4+tlsDG7ULOeHFocjqdp/U5mbWpTzBfXPii8kwbGv0nzWpdsObFjEboLYKKf0/NbVf53lOQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729407866; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pzNJI/8qDlSaeLJMr6T4MBZi4jR1JswtTpJtLrBrlSM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u7ohvYNJExTR8FexnzRbsGc+jlDFPO3MVKY4cJIbklQ5D5G6U7lhW2To+oxzKKPopephImYDipZbApsZGl+LmgZX+jvu+Kdxa+ucDCpBoEee2euwNEXJz3g11ZMkwB2ylsL7XV2to4pRVSDdG3yQstEYa1Y7dlWgJX4z6g8JtLQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=D3LF7IVo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="D3LF7IVo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729407865; x=1760943865; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pzNJI/8qDlSaeLJMr6T4MBZi4jR1JswtTpJtLrBrlSM=; b=D3LF7IVo8ngiqCrAnJcAnhHtBWifAHpV0MbFOThwkw5Q16VHXJnjbssa r6feXve3/DFBgy/XkBubbMx0vh+1ubE7fp0VJjqUW8JrQyJBMrJJGmJyY AARNWDUdKKcUyPr85w/w59RCFfnDbNnddVMhYHKJs9HQ/Pb+9GGVBQg7X t/MrB8LBGshqL56Y+kwaOqUqpyUCfYcqyYshqptACf6tsgI/tZHEVKcPX 4wET9lE6SIMaINLA24oNYYnHZevGqB1WDbQ6YlXYG9syAJA9Nu2VpkBzP Q7hLqkw0nX8CgE+VL0lW8G4VZgqmQQCUCgzwB/R1KiyOcWaLrX98DPvnj g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZHsj3NlORzKXHikB2XbC0A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Oh4XRR3bQFufFhn6x8nKuw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="29016763" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="29016763" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Oct 2024 00:04:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VJjJC3EYTJCnwgmpS7TpJg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RFbF5ww/RI6thIAus7OnxA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,218,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="110071201" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2024 00:04:23 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t2PzA-000Q13-2D; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:04:20 +0000 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 15:04:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Guixin Liu , bhelgaas@google.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: optimize proc sequential file read Message-ID: <202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241018054728.116519-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241018054728.116519-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com> Hi Guixin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on pci/next] [also build test WARNING on pci/for-linus linus/master v6.12-rc3 next-20241018] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Guixin-Liu/PCI-optimize-proc-sequential-file-read/20241018-135026 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241018054728.116519-1-kanie%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [PATCH] PCI: optimize proc sequential file read config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20241019 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241020/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410201436.9i93qAYF-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/pci/proc.c:22:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pci_seq_tree' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/pci_seq_tree +22 drivers/pci/proc.c 21 > 22 DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(pci_seq_tree, 0); 23 static unsigned long pci_max_idx; 24 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki