RE: [PATCH v5 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms

Wei Fang
2024-10-25T02:25:02Z

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:53:20PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > index c26bd66e4597..92a26b09cf57 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf.h
> > @@ -58,3 +58,16 @@ struct enetc_pf {
> > int enetc_msg_psi_init(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_psi_free(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > void enetc_msg_handle_rxmsg(struct enetc_pf *pf, int mbox_id, u16
> *status);
> > +
> > +void enetc_pf_get_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si, u8
> *addr);
> > +void enetc_pf_set_primary_mac_addr(struct enetc_hw *hw, int si,
> > + const u8 *addr);
> > +int enetc_pf_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *ndev, void *addr);
> > +int enetc_setup_mac_addresses(struct device_node *np, struct enetc_pf
> *pf);
> > +void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> > + const struct net_device_ops *ndev_ops);
> > +int enetc_mdiobus_create(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *node);
> > +void enetc_mdiobus_destroy(struct enetc_pf *pf);
> > +int enetc_phylink_create(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, struct device_node
> *node,
> > + const struct phylink_mac_ops *ops);
> > +void enetc_phylink_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv);
>
> Could you put the prototypes of functions exported by enetc_pf_common.c
> into a header named enetc_pf_common.h? It should be self-contained, i.e.
> a dummy C file with just #include "enetc_pf_common.h" in it should compile
> fine.
>

Sure, I'll add a new header file.

> I know the enetc driver isn't there yet when it comes to thoroughly
> respecting that, but for code we touch now, we should try to follow it.