From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17A415C14B; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 07:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731569238; cv=none; b=PItnuEayfzkukT/N8vKQmMRU/bJUYkHewLZAGXgqwTgK7wZ6rDC+Iyqozaezec1290w3NvtiuvrN7wi1wZD7fiUkvOTxroRwYkYmfrMZQ5VS/W8vTreFWJOu7AmTEd7PvgSWIYODgPy1ZSVpEOj+J+R1uClQIeQp2TK6lkx81nI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731569238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lLrYh6zWY0rI+VJ0Im+QzYqc0TqVGxFrhyHRj+UlvN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UXw9WMI8JezPSYGdFKONLWsD6JhHDS1okVCAWMJy1b/yFh5QlZtvuFMSxs7ZRlWlr5JU1lPz6YXiIFbPTpZpb/Er7qtPmUwCM8um1h4G/UTRoQ/PvO8fINXqyV0IC/tCSz1LtxhV7VHmo+Z/RGlUGXeobuj/9remZegVRnfVJJ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=wyVFMNs9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="wyVFMNs9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE635C4CECF; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 07:27:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1731569237; bh=lLrYh6zWY0rI+VJ0Im+QzYqc0TqVGxFrhyHRj+UlvN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wyVFMNs9hAoSmgHreTZiTyJeiX3SRcl+IiXGE8f+E4NKFvbcnuIVJe5YoXSdgvXRg Ft2AGXx/JXDmAbeQor/7FjQkky3VaI1PJSyQJHNS3rfNXB/LFI2PDTqBySh5j4anGT da/f8LkW6xtELS81syPSUruAdV67RwStZwocOo1g= Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:27:13 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Joshua Peraza Cc: rajatja@google.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, bhelgaas@google.com, dtor@google.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, helgaas@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, jsbarnes@google.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, oohall@gmail.com, pavel@denx.de, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, rajatxjain@gmail.com, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/ACPI: Support Microsoft's "DmaProperty" Message-ID: <2024111411-mating-granddad-11f6@gregkh> References: <20220426172105.3663170-2-rajatja@google.com> <20241113202214.1421739-1-jperaza@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241113202214.1421739-1-jperaza@google.com> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 08:22:12PM +0000, Joshua Peraza wrote: > This patchset rebases two previously posted patches supporting > recognition of Microsoft's DmaProperty. > > Rajat Jain (2): > PCI/ACPI: Support Microsoft's "DmaProperty" > PCI: Rename pci_dev->untrusted to pci_dev->untrusted_dma I thought we went through a lot of different choices when picking this name, and explicitly did NOT use the "_dma" term here for a reason. Can you go and read those old patch submissions to verify why we did so, and what has changed since then and then document here what has changed to allow this name change now? thanks, greg k-h