From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Rick Wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:41:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241115224145.GA2064331@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017015849.190271-2-dlemoal@kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:58:36AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The rockchip PCIe endpoint controller handles PCIe transfers addresses
> by masking the lower bits of the programmed PCI address and using the
> same number of lower bits masked from the CPU address space used for the
> mapping. For a PCI mapping of <size> bytes starting from <pci_addr>,
> the number of bits masked is the number of address bits changing in the
> address range [pci_addr..pci_addr + size - 1].
>
> However, rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu() calculates num_pass_bits only
> using the size of the mapping, resulting in an incorrect number of mask
> bits depending on the value of the PCI address to map.
>
> Fix this by introducing the helper function
> rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits() to correctly calculate the number of
> mask bits to use to program the address translation unit. The number of
> mask bits is calculated depending on both the PCI address and size of
> the mapping, and clamped between 8 and 20 using the macros
> ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS and ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS. As
> defined in the Rockchip RK3399 TRM V1.3 Part2, Sections 17.5.5.1.1 and
> 17.6.8.2.1, this clamping is necessary because:
> 1) The lower 8 bits of the PCI address to be mapped by the outbound
> region are ignored. So a minimum of 8 address bits are needed and
> imply that the PCI address must be aligned to 256.
> 2) The outbound memory regions are 1MB in size. So while we can specify
> up to 63-bits for the PCI address (num_bits filed uses bits 0 to 5 of
> the outbound address region 0 register), we must limit the number of
> valid address bits to 20 to match the memory window maximum size (1
> << 20 = 1MB).
>
> Fixes: cf590b078391 ("PCI: rockchip: Add EP driver for Rockchip PCIe controller")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> index 136274533656..27a7febb74e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> @@ -63,16 +63,23 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_clear_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_OB_REGION_DESC1(region));
> }
>
> +static int rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> + u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
> +{
> + int num_pass_bits = fls64(pci_addr ^ (pci_addr + size - 1));
> +
> + return clamp(num_pass_bits, ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS,
> + ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS);
> +}
> +
> static void rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u8 fn,
> u32 r, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr,
> size_t size)
> {
> - int num_pass_bits = fls64(size - 1);
> + int num_pass_bits =
> + rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits(rockchip, pci_addr, size);
> u32 addr0, addr1, desc0;
>
> - if (num_pass_bits < 8)
> - num_pass_bits = 8;
> -
> addr0 = ((num_pass_bits - 1) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_NUM_BITS) |
> (lower_32_bits(pci_addr) & PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_LO_ADDR);
PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_NUM_BITS is 0x3f and
rockchip_pcie_ep_ob_atu_num_bits() returns something between 8 and
0x14, inclusive? So masking with PCIE_CORE_OB_REGION_ADDR0_NUM_BITS
doesn't do anything, does it?
Also, "..._NUM_BITS" is kind of a weird name for a mask.
rockchip_pcie_prog_ob_atu() in pcie-rockchip-host.c is similar but
different; it looks like all callers supply num_pass_bits=19. I
assume it doesn't need a similar change?
> addr1 = upper_32_bits(pci_addr);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> index 6111de35f84c..15ee949f2485 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@
> (PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
> #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_VIRT_FUNC_BASE(fn) \
> (PCIE_EP_PF_CONFIG_REGS_BASE + 0x10000 + (((fn) << 12) & GENMASK(19, 12)))
> +
> +#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MIN_NUM_BITS 8
> +#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_MAX_NUM_BITS 20
> +
> #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR0(fn, bar) \
> (PCIE_CORE_AXI_CONF_BASE + 0x0828 + (fn) * 0x0040 + (bar) * 0x0008)
> #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_AT_IB_EP_FUNC_BAR_ADDR1(fn, bar) \
> --
> 2.47.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-15 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 1:58 [PATCH v5 00/14] Fix and improve the Rockchip endpoint driver Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix address translation unit programming Damien Le Moal
2024-11-15 22:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-11-17 8:04 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Use a macro to define EP controller .align feature Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_unmap_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve rockchip_pcie_ep_map_addr() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Implement the pci_epc_ops::align_addr() operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Fix MSI IRQ data mapping Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 9:52 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Rename rockchip_pcie_parse_ep_dt() Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() memory allocations Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor rockchip_pcie_ep_probe() MSI-X hiding Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Refactor endpoint link training enable Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] PCI: rockship-ep: Implement the pci_epc_ops::stop_link() operation Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Improve link training Damien Le Moal
2024-11-15 23:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-11-17 8:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] PCI: rockchip-ep: Handle PERST# signal in endpoint mode Damien Le Moal
2024-12-15 0:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-15 2:09 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-10-17 1:58 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rockpro64 overlay for PCIe " Damien Le Moal
2024-10-29 10:35 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] Fix and improve the Rockchip endpoint driver Damien Le Moal
2024-11-13 14:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-11-13 17:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-11-13 20:59 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-11-14 4:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2024-11-14 17:24 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-11-13 20:49 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-12-16 5:49 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-12-16 6:00 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-12-16 6:05 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241115224145.GA2064331@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).