Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	lukas@wunner.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] PCI: Allow PCI bridges to go to D3Hot on all Devicetree based platforms
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:40:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241127061039.ls3ghxswft3hvww5@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241126151711.v5.1.Id0a0e78ab0421b6bce51c4b0b87e6aebdfc69ec7@changeid>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 03:17:11PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> 
> Unlike ACPI based platforms, there are no known issues with D3Hot for
> the PCI bridges in Device Tree based platforms. Past discussions (Link
> [1]) determined the restrictions around D3 should be relaxed for all
> Device Tree systems. So let's allow the PCI bridges to go to D3Hot
> during runtime.
> 
> To match devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() -> devm_of_pci_bridge_init(), we
> look at the host bridge's parent when determining whether this is a
> Device Tree based platform. Not all bridges have their own node, but the
> parent (controller) should.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240227225442.GA249898@bhelgaas/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240828210705.GA37859@bhelgaas/ [2]
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> [Brian: look at host bridge's parent, not bridge node; rewrite
> description]
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

Thanks for picking it up!

- Mani

> ---
> Based on prior work by Manivannan Sadhasivam that was part of a bigger
> series that stalled:
> 
> [PATCH v5 4/4] PCI: Allow PCI bridges to go to D3Hot on all Devicetree based platforms
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240802-pci-bridge-d3-v5-4-2426dd9e8e27@linaro.org/
> 
> I'm resubmitting this single patch, since it's useful and seemingly had
> agreement. I massaged it a bit to relax some restrictions on how the
> Device Tree should look.
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Pulled out of the larger series, as there were more controversial
>   changes in there, while this one had agreement (Link [2]).
> - Rewritten with a relaxed set of rules, because the above patch
>   required us to modify many device trees to add bridge nodes.
> 
>  drivers/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index e278861684bc..5d898f5ea155 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -3018,6 +3018,8 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id bridge_d3_blacklist[] = {
>   */
>  bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  {
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host_bridge;
> +
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(bridge))
>  		return false;
>  
> @@ -3038,6 +3040,15 @@ bool pci_bridge_d3_possible(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  		if (pci_bridge_d3_force)
>  			return true;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Allow D3 for all Device Tree based systems. We assume a host
> +		 * bridge's parent will have a device node, even if this bridge
> +		 * may not have its own.
> +		 */
> +		host_bridge = pci_find_host_bridge(bridge->bus);
> +		if (dev_of_node(host_bridge->dev.parent))
> +			return true;
> +
>  		/* Even the oldest 2010 Thunderbolt controller supports D3. */
>  		if (bridge->is_thunderbolt)
>  			return true;
> -- 
> 2.47.0.338
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-27  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-26 23:17 [PATCH v5] PCI: Allow PCI bridges to go to D3Hot on all Devicetree based platforms Brian Norris
2024-11-27  6:10 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2025-01-07 22:14 ` Brian Norris
2025-02-28 17:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-28 18:39   ` Brian Norris
2025-03-05  6:29     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-05 13:41     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-13  5:21       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-03-20 17:57         ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241127061039.ls3ghxswft3hvww5@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox