From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com (mail-pf1-f180.google.com [209.85.210.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57DE314B06E for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 16:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732897832; cv=none; b=iwvmagSc29bT74DZPuEDk1khF3BuJwQCXVG6/8e9asYDuB+gY1SFVsaMBtqZsw87HHgO277aBa8H6qwgx4SsakcbAtcyDMRKx4WrT7NzUC62kSm5/SWtBo3k8INVx18sYCCSRUDoAUL21vxlacwIdN6UPtZhr512fncTVDHzz6c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732897832; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4LUwpfrnHFkQR7mkasG/yVhtbXt53mi0rkc8s6chCjM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NA73mjrmAFKl9bi/Mo0ydK6rjT//ca2HYCnkmF3kl7lPbNLmVqFhnatP2dhJGxf0EatrkOh4hZ79Pls3JC8d1oImFI+dzSxfwpqk6eaI2WnNw9/4mVjF7+F6eL0msGk7kIdOIPk376L+E/q8Lw5VMAtguBn/LMdAjbp/auCAI6I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=WfDzfvLM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="WfDzfvLM" Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-724f383c5bfso1649445b3a.1 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1732897831; x=1733502631; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QyeRJ0oZlkItp/9Z/e7gPKi87niWzmGMkQiYND8MHPw=; b=WfDzfvLMod+EfZk3ofLK6Onxu8f1JIqIgCo4zuKhf1lmn4K35Ecx7IdTZ/kE4hUjgC 7QAt6BN7WIWPzD3A8rWGcv+oCk9AI1sZvx9ejQnzbee4z7UlXtHKxrOF80R31uKK8vc5 6Mn6HwBhCovQbPVizoIpYAcVL/5kF/TZSR0EU9Wgqk6/n6sewkCa6e66mpF+wPs+2SQr DAx4LxXpkD1qI7q3q/cUkLAQOaEaSyTTLfJQtqZPLOm8BxNZYY5rw81FWZEVb6ObafPM aT0M9Oz9gVFpeMCJtbm7/Cd1H4eR9BkeSpYc9791R8SRXwRkaUBBgYDh3CiaoOxRiBEB uvZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1732897831; x=1733502631; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QyeRJ0oZlkItp/9Z/e7gPKi87niWzmGMkQiYND8MHPw=; b=wtsAjpIbKcewOPu5FXPmOGwquNcgWUPL6NBtMFYWDLZOwKZddgZ0y6jjL9mBKEUdbA mWDtt9TzzERE7AVzp0KfbLmFAC2z22+BI4xF4y3RoxixvMlJOfZc+WytFfoi7Ges+6oR DgXIUhnqFTno+gC71LCXohWQx+95K0imphaBcy+t3NlNQqwBJ19IwmJ849pxEyLKb4ht Kxsn4aEGLw1S1fYgIZJ5qN3x/4+Qlqki6pR7M2tnrvj1BAdR+4aNp7p2Vw7w9/kB70df H+w9b+2pLNN+QyNCctCfLyuwI4+5ddtM99n/6tClqzQ3OK8oPMhcYAMsUhqKvcRFKlx0 tyPg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWtwK0hff0OoIp7Ec8Zm5Ga4Z1kKLUHUKHwON3qYuJ3L6DsFfcDtVny6wmf/ZaIbwnHMelotbsU91o=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzOpj9AMFhzGGL6tdnppSbMHAZgM6KfQzbpsbdhNxmxx0BaVoPq jxvDqSjSk4f6eMGNflK+pJAuHbHr6LnObupqGGdPCBZ9XV5LSAYc0HZdYf5Hag== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvvwM5vamdq6vJIpINYgsGUwRy+Y8f75AuJmd1n9HQjiBfgypLoemoHUD/qo83 LyzHmhUaUb8jQACVxj9NhxWNmKH8sRBJLrcDkjlbN6LadMHXe8eSUZHad3qrr5C8zd3OVOT/HRm dyCx8uWiLfk6b6e83rZ8hWWAPp+9Xj7G4O0GPP4R+xyAGxLxMVFUCtQ1HJC0c43Pskxmq3KWKw0 o5ios+pPvvz5E/naU8vnsh3Ni5e5jTHuKzjoIbOMdDwVwq7Nhiopg1aiL2+ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH/b79cT3F2/ZbtOtbSBA5CGpMCFdRTUFf0LguaqMw2cMJZe8pECNxkpAmdc42N2WE/pRPSOA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b45:b0:725:7a8:6f7c with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7253017ba1amr16472888b3a.26.1732897830504; Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([120.60.57.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72541828c61sm3677043b3a.163.2024.11.29.08.30.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:30:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:00:24 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Damien Le Moal Cc: kw@linux.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, lpieralisi@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, aman1.gupta@samsung.com, p.rajanbabu@samsung.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL Message-ID: <20241129163024.dvz2ojldopeoyr6c@thinkpad> References: <20241129092415.29437-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20241129092415.29437-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:51:30PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 11/29/24 18:24, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > IOCTLs are supposed to return 0 for success and negative error codes for > > failure. Currently, this driver is returning 0 for failure and 1 for > > success, that's not correct. Hence, fix it! > > > > Reported-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YvzNg5ROnxEApDgS@kroah.com > > Fixes: 2c156ac71c6b ("misc: Add host side PCI driver for PCI test function device") > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > Looks OK to me. > > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal > > One nit below. > > [...] > > > static void pci_endpoint_test_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > diff --git a/tools/pci/pcitest.c b/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > index 470258009ddc..545e04ad63a2 100644 > > --- a/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > +++ b/tools/pci/pcitest.c > > @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ > > > > #include > > > > -static char *result[] = { "NOT OKAY", "OKAY" }; > > static char *irq[] = { "LEGACY", "MSI", "MSI-X" }; > > > > struct pci_test { > > @@ -52,63 +51,65 @@ static int run_test(struct pci_test *test) > > ret = ioctl(fd, PCITEST_BAR, test->barnum); > > fprintf(stdout, "BAR%d:\t\t", test->barnum); > > if (ret < 0) > > - fprintf(stdout, "TEST FAILED\n"); > > + fprintf(stdout, "NOT OKAY\n"); > > else > > - fprintf(stdout, "%s\n", result[ret]); > > + fprintf(stdout, "OKAY\n"); > > Maybe replace all this "if (ret < 0) ... else ..." and all the ones below with > something a call to: > > static void test_result(int ret) > { > fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : ""); > } > > or simply with the call: > > fprintf(stdout, "%sOKAY\n", ret < 0 ? "NOT " : ""); > > to avoid all these repetition. > Sounds good to me. Will incorporate in next version, thanks! - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்