Re: [PATCH v4 04/15] PCI/AER: Modify AER driver logging to report CXL or PCIe bus error type

Li Ming
2024-12-14T13:35:21Z

On 12/13/2024 3:59 AM, Bowman, Terry wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2024 7:34 PM, Li Ming wrote:
>> On 12/12/2024 7:39 AM, Terry Bowman wrote:
>>> The AER driver and aer_event tracing currently log 'PCIe Bus Type'
>>> for all errors.
>>>
>>> Update the driver and aer_event tracing to log 'CXL Bus Type' for CXL
>>> device errors.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>> include/ras/ras_event.h | 9 ++++++---
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>> index fe6edf26279e..53e9a11f6c0f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>>> @@ -699,13 +699,14 @@ static void __aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev,
>>>
>>> void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
>>> {
>>> + const char *bus_type = pcie_is_cxl(dev) ? "CXL" : "PCIe";
>>> int layer, agent;
>>> int id = pci_dev_id(dev);
>>> const char *level;
>>>
>>> if (!info->status) {
>>> - pci_err(dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent ID)\n",
>>> - aer_error_severity_string[info->severity]);
>>> + pci_err(dev, "%s Bus Error: severity=%s, type=Inaccessible, (Unregistered Agent ID)\n",
>>> + bus_type, aer_error_severity_string[info->severity]);
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -714,8 +715,8 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
>>>
>>> level = (info->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE) ? KERN_WARNING : KERN_ERR;
>>>
>>> - pci_printk(level, dev, "PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, type=%s, (%s)\n",
>>> - aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
>>> + pci_printk(level, dev, "%s Bus Error: severity=%s, type=%s, (%s)\n",
>>> + bus_type, aer_error_severity_string[info->severity],
>>> aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
>>>
>>> pci_printk(level, dev, " device [%04x:%04x] error status/mask=%08x/%08x\n",
>>> @@ -730,7 +731,7 @@ void aer_print_error(struct pci_dev *dev, struct aer_err_info *info)
>>> if (info->id && info->error_dev_num > 1 && info->id == id)
>>> pci_err(dev, " Error of this Agent is reported first\n");
>>>
>>> - trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), (info->status & ~info->mask),
>>> + trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), bus_type, (info->status & ~info->mask),
>>> info->severity, info->tlp_header_valid, &info->tlp);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -764,6 +765,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cper_severity_to_aer);
>>> void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
>>> struct aer_capability_regs *aer)
>>> {
>>> + const char *bus_type = pcie_is_cxl(dev) ? "CXL" : "PCIe";
>>> int layer, agent, tlp_header_valid = 0;
>>> u32 status, mask;
>>> struct aer_err_info info;
>>> @@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
>>> if (tlp_header_valid)
>>> __print_tlp_header(dev, &aer->header_log);
>>>
>>> - trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), (status & ~mask),
>>> + trace_aer_event(dev_name(&dev->dev), bus_type, (status & ~mask),
>>> aer_severity, tlp_header_valid, &aer->header_log);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(pci_print_aer, CXL);
>>> diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>>> index e5f7ee0864e7..1bf8e7050ba8 100644
>>> --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
>>> +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
>>> @@ -297,15 +297,17 @@ TRACE_EVENT(non_standard_event,
>>>
>>> TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
>>> TP_PROTO(const char *dev_name,
>>> + const char *bus_type,
>>> const u32 status,
>>> const u8 severity,
>>> const u8 tlp_header_valid,
>>> struct pcie_tlp_log *tlp),
>>>
>>> - TP_ARGS(dev_name, status, severity, tlp_header_valid, tlp),
>>> + TP_ARGS(dev_name, bus_type, status, severity, tlp_header_valid, tlp),
>>>
>>> TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>> __string( dev_name, dev_name )
>>> + __string( bus_type, bus_type )
>>> __field( u32, status )
>>> __field( u8, severity )
>>> __field( u8, tlp_header_valid)
>>> @@ -314,6 +316,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
>>>
>>> TP_fast_assign(
>>> __assign_str(dev_name);
>>> + __assign_str(bus_type);
>>> __entry->status = status;
>>> __entry->severity = severity;
>>> __entry->tlp_header_valid = tlp_header_valid;
>>> @@ -325,8 +328,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(aer_event,
>>> }
>>> ),
>>>
>>> - TP_printk("%s PCIe Bus Error: severity=%s, %s, TLP Header=%s\n",
>>> - __get_str(dev_name),
>>> + TP_printk("%s %s Bus Error: severity=%s, %s, TLP Header=%s\n",
>>> + __get_str(dev_name), __get_str(bus_type),
>>> __entry->severity == AER_CORRECTABLE ? "Corrected" :
>>> __entry->severity == AER_FATAL ?
>>> "Fatal" : "Uncorrected, non-fatal",
>> Hi Terry,
>>
>>
>> Patch #3 is using flexbus dvsec to identify CXL RP/USP/DSP. But per CXL r3.1 section 9.12.3 "Enumerating CXL RPs and DSPs", there may be a flexbus dvsec if CXL RP/DSP is in disconnect state or connecting to a PCIe device.
>>
>> If a PCIe device connects to a CXL RP/DSP, and the CXL RP/DSP reports an error, the error log will be also "CXL Bus Type", is it expected? My understanding is that the CXL RP/DSP is working on PCIe mode.
>>
>> If not, I think that setting "pci_dev->is_cxl" during cxl port enumeration and CXL device probing is another option.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ming
>>
> Hi Ming,
>
> aer_print_error() logs the AER details (including bus type) for the device that detected the error
> not the RPAER reporting agent unless the error is detected in the RP. The bus type is determined
> using the 'dev' parameter and in your example is a PCIe device not a CXL device. aer_print_error()
> will log "PCI bus" because the flexbus DVSEC will not be present in 'dev' config space.
>
> I agree in your example the RP and downstream device will train to PCIe mode and not CXL mode. But, the
> flexbus DVSEC will still be present in the RP PCIe configuration space. The pci_dev::is_cxl structure
> member indicates CXL support and is not reflective of the current training state.
>
> Regards,
> Terry
>
>
Got it, thanks for your explanation.

Thanks

Ming