From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EEFC1AF0B4; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736374400; cv=none; b=TtlssXjeGLoSKJx2Pqb0JYFyc3wk8giSMNxh1bjr+zvp1krEaY6Yeu9ntJahZkIg66x1u2GnmKlD7h3JUqU2AF+u31YkvoYFujNFaGC47lBxxgUk9rWHzhlr3aS0McJtuykcCNirqMMli7y2SDrrmy4hlkGiXI4Qj9Bhh2I0TVg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736374400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=txUAMzhnn7qnCj8VsLdnRbJXjg/Wnh8MafOMw9qmsJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C5L7y9haNQm9ZY1cgoyh8b7aJhOxPqr5UXGRK+nDXitm9ie/NsbGtB0B3X2w42IbWPpHb5mP5+zsOvHMiaggqv1I0/+bOOHPPMTUBtcihPSm+fGBSK1jsFY6OT6dp8CHwNFkXlmLWXNd7DTO6uKDFrw3yfQJGum88jT4Np8Trj0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OAPqRI6q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OAPqRI6q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6453C4CED3; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:13:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736374400; bh=txUAMzhnn7qnCj8VsLdnRbJXjg/Wnh8MafOMw9qmsJI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=OAPqRI6qhZFwKNSL1zVQhAgS3F4n5EqH4LM0jvyt5QAHNLFKETMnozpP/d306lw7W 70yl3BBuN4/J0h2VUVSBAJJRXfEQYjMOsF/EH77qUY9fo3RnUndVFiMyuyKNWmN3cK RPJUJf3TLxH70w85oxWkv9C7SyoVrPfkRVsi7wL/zIWstBm2gZsw97ZC9wY7FGf12o qg94rEnw2B+9uwGcTH7jbWGAVBEposCXtRDhHeOJbZxtWCliSUe7GaU3QQ5K0FYUPc gkeVDPSxlc8idghs8J99knDTQ8OlVvIxfwZK3GFUmJo2mXFhsfi2Pk3FrxXCzm+XZQ z4ZSD/vCPC7CQ== Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:13:18 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Yazen Ghannam Cc: Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Lukas Wunner , Jonathan Cameron , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Oliver O'Halloran , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] PCI: Make pcie_read_tlp_log() signature same Message-ID: <20250108221318.GA232458@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250108204011.GA1342186@yaz-khff2.amd.com> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:40:11PM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 04:37:43PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > pcie_read_tlp_log()'s prototype and function signature diverged due to > > changes made while applying. > > > > Make the parameters of pcie_read_tlp_log() named identically. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > > Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam > > Just wondering, could this be squashed into the previous patch? Or is > the goal to be strict with one logical change per patch? I haven't looked closely enough to opine on whether this should be squashed, but I generally do prefer one logical change per patch. It's much easier for me to squash things when merging than it is to untangle things that should be separate patches. Bjorn